(29 Nov 2020, 10:54 am)Storx wrote Yeah agreed with GNE, there's absolute no logic to where things are either especially in Sunderland, the 2 and 39 being pretty much identical routes for most of it but two numbers with little history and they're miles apart for no reason. 35 and 55 between Sunderland and Houghton where the 55 comes from god knows as they're Sheriff Hill services. Then you have the odd numbers which make no sense being there, 6 to Stanley; 11 in N. Shields for example.
When the 2006 changes came about, there was some sort of pattern.
It didn't last long, as they soon realised that the decisions made then, weren't the best. Revisions and changes since have rendered the numbering system totally out of sync.
I do think that having some sort of pattern is better for passengers. However the two digit system limits what can and can't be done.
The old 3 digit system had some quirks, but people tended to know it and understand it. Enthusiasts or not.
1xx - Wearside.
2xx - East Durham
3xx - North Tyneside
4xx - Northumberland
5xx - South Tyneside
6xx - Tyne Valley
7xx - Co Durham
The fact the 9xx series continues to live on now with workers services and the like, seems to confirm my thoughts.
There's a reason the 9 prefix still exists and it's not to keep enthusiasts happy.