(29 May 2021, 12:20 am)Micheal Aaron wrote It's not that. It's just a name of a branding. I don't see why it's such a big complain
It's a forum, get over it.
Skip to main content
(30 May 2021, 4:40 pm)Micheal Aaron wrote It's the question of how many buses from the 58/93/94, are getting done. 6149,6153 that's only 5. As 6154 is 2019 corp so maybe it will be allocated to the 58
As for the 93/94 I don't know how many run on there so not sure. Maybe could see a same was with the Crusader how it goes 6002/07 then 6051/55
(30 May 2021, 5:12 pm)Micheal Aaron wrote Wait the pvr for the 93/94 is 6 I thought it would have been 8. 4 buses on each. I'm surprised at that as of how popular it is
(30 May 2021, 5:24 pm)Micheal Aaron wrote Ah I see. Is there any other services that have been affected and had there pvr cut down
(30 May 2021, 5:56 pm)Malarkey wrote whereas other services are more slack like the 309 where drivers seems to get a good few minutes at certain stops along the route from observations made on route to work at the Cobalt especially on a Sunday Service iirc they get approx 5/6 minutes wait time along the route between Newcastle and Cobalt which for a short journey is quite a lot in my opinion.When the suns out though or a match is on, the Sunday 309 journeys are known to run 10-15 mins late.
(02 Jun 2021, 8:33 pm)mb134 wrote Go North East | 6149 by West Yorkshire Bus Spotter, on Flickr
That's a nice livery you've got there, be a shame if someone put an advert on it...
Go North East 6150 LJ62KCU by aptyldsley, on Flickr
Surely the frames should have been removed, or fare info should have been placed somewhere else?
(02 Jun 2021, 8:56 pm)Adrian wrote It doesn't look too bad when the ad board is only covering what is essentially an internal ad. Certainly better than the days where ad boards covered large parts of the branding, and even the logo in some cases.
(02 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm)mb134 wrote Don't get me wrong, I don't have an issue with the ad being there. I just find it odd that they've left the frames around what seems to be part of the livery, and then someone's gone straight away to slap an advert over the top of it?
I can only assume they were meant to remove the frames, given that the CityRider and Crusader B9s done in the same style had them removed.
Edit: Same with that First B9. From memory ANEs E400MMCs have the same with t-adverts covering the ANE URL.
(02 Jun 2021, 10:34 pm)Dan wrote The Cityrider buses never had advertisement frames.Have the metro shuttles and one of the quaulink gone for refurb? They not been in service for over a month and presumably would of already been repainted before now
Only half the Crusaders did, so they were removed.
The East Gateshead buses should have frames fitted (and the livery has been designed to accommodate them, unlike what we’ve seen in the past where they’ve been retrofitted and covered half the design and left half the design outside of the frame) but there shouldn’t be any adverts in them yet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(02 Jun 2021, 10:34 pm)Dan wrote The East Gateshead buses should have frames fitted (and the livery has been designed to accommodate them, unlike what we’ve seen in the past where they’ve been retrofitted and covered half the design and left half the design outside of the frame) but there shouldn’t be any adverts in them yet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(02 Jun 2021, 8:33 pm)mb134 wrote Go North East | 6149 by West Yorkshire Bus Spotter, on Flickr
That's a nice livery you've got there, be a shame if someone put an advert on it...
Go North East 6150 LJ62KCU by aptyldsley, on Flickr
Surely the frames should have been removed, or fare info should have been placed somewhere else?
Saw some pics of the new First Doncaster livery today too - wonder if they've been sharing a design agency...
First South Yorkshire 36239 BN 12 WOX Doncaster Racecourse. by bedford97, on Flickr
(03 Jun 2021, 8:12 am)Andreos1 wrote I was passing through Donny a couple of months ago and saw the livery.
Compared it to the new colour scheme on the 56.
Apparently the 56 colour scheme was done by a different agency to normal.
So now we have an agency that copies a copy and paste agency.
No idea who did this one. Could be the copy and paste agency or the agency that copies the copy and paste agency
(03 Jun 2021, 9:01 am)omnicity4659 wrote If a different copy and paste agency has indeed copied that particular copy and paste agency for the 56 livery, then they've done a very good job at copying and pasting.
But I just think it's the one copy and paste agency who doesn't seem to be able to copy and paste consistency between liveries.
(03 Jun 2021, 8:12 am)Andreos1 wrote I was passing through Donny a couple of months ago and saw the livery.And here is another similar livery
Compared it to the new colour scheme on the 56.
Apparently the 56 colour scheme was done by a different agency to normal.
So now we have an agency that copies a copy and paste agency.
No idea who did this one. Could be the copy and paste agency or the agency that copies the copy and paste agency
(03 Jun 2021, 5:38 pm)busmanT wrote And here is another similar livery
https://flic.kr/p/2kYpvrT
(03 Jun 2021, 5:49 pm)streetdeckfan wrote It's even got the same awful vinyl on the front window!
(03 Jun 2021, 5:38 pm)busmanT wrote And here is another similar livery
https://flic.kr/p/2kYpvrT
(03 Jun 2021, 8:55 pm)Micheal Aaron wrote Tbh we are coming into a new era of bus branding.
Stagecoach want all there buses to look the same. Same livery
Go North East seem to be doing branding that won't confused people. Like many branding did with wacky names. (Some were good. Some were bad)
Arriva seem to be doing a new style of blue to there buses while introducing a new style of Sapphire and fazing out the max brand.
Like how many buses have been debrand or changed from max to Sapphire or max to normal
Mainly Go North East with there X Lines saying there part of a branding. Fast and quick services. Tbh some of the branding that's was previously before coming X Lines made little to no sense
Red Arrows X1 (Don't know what that was meant to symbolise)
Red Kite X45/6/7 (Showing the buses passed the area where Red kites have been spotted and the Red Kite trail) possible but could be wrong
ToonLink X70/71 (A link to the toon I'm guessing from Stanley and Consett)
Tynedale Express X84/85 (Simpl a Tynedale Express from Hexham to Newcastle)
Can't say much on the X9/X10 as there's was simpl before becoming X Lines
Castle Express X21(Didn't see the point in this part unless there was a reason)
X Lines is one of GNE better branding. Giving them a new look to show there the quicker links to other buses.
Especially with the X21 & 21. Quicker links to Durham between the two
(03 Jun 2021, 9:59 pm)Storx wrote Red Arrows - Doesn't mean anything was just an early brand I believe.Yea. Granted it would be better if East part out. It would be better.
Red Kite - Derwentside Red Kites
Toonlink - Links to the 'toon' from Winlaton and Prudhoe (originally on the Scotswood Road services / 604)
Castles Express - Links all the castles express: Newcastle, Durham and Bishop Auckland.
The two newest brands are up there with two of the most irrelevant and stupid brands imo especially when they've both had the same name for over 10 year now; it's more pointless name changes for the sake of it.
East Gateshead Rider is by the far out of the two and up there with imo the worst brands ever. If your going to brand any route about horses then it has to be the 12 with the Blaydon Races links. It's had a brand, people knew what the brand was and they've ditched it imo for no reason at all (Citylink). By all means modernise brands but renaming them every few years defeats the point in the first place.
East Gateshead Loop is just confusing and bizarre. Right you want to get the 'East Gateshead' Loop to Team Valley the place which is furthest West you can go in Gateshead.
I've said about the crap copy and pasting bland brands before though so won't moan about that again.