Blinkin heck,nexus are early,new timetables up in Wallsend

(02 Sep 2021, 11:27 am)54APhotography wrote 9068 is allox 6175

Forgot that was free. That means if (and hopefully) the Ex Scotland B9s are kept for the red kite ranger they'd be numbered 6177-6182

(02 Sep 2021, 12:13 pm)GNE6312 wrote Forgot that was free. That means if (and hopefully) the Ex Scotland B9s are kept for the red kite ranger they'd be numbered 6177-6182

It's still not refreshed , a covid victim and of course back of the queue with paint...
Those B9 are decent, be ideal for the 47, must have five years life in them, worth an upgrade to Euro 6

(02 Sep 2021, 12:17 pm)54APhotography wrote It's still not refreshed , a covid victim and of course back of the queue with paint...
Those B9 are decent, be ideal for the 47, must have five years life in them, worth an upgrade to Euro 6

Tbh I would rather have the coaster buses a must say. A massive downgrade for the 47, I think many people who use the 47 will be quite angry. But where will the 7 Ex-Coasters go which are unneeded. 3 to Deptford, 3 to Washington 1 Spare.

(02 Sep 2021, 12:32 pm)Keeiajs wrote Tbh I would rather have the coaster buses a must say. A massive downgrade for the 47, I think many people who use the 47 will be quite angry. But where will the 7 Ex-Coasters go which are unneeded. 3 to Deptford, 3 to Washington 1 Spare.

It is possible that 6065-70 could be converted to euro6 B5 by July 2022.

(02 Sep 2021, 12:47 pm)54APhotography wrote It is possible that 6065-70 could be converted to euro6 B5 by July 2022.

Yeah I mean, to get buses which are 12 years older. With i don't even think Wifi is a massive downgrade, and if that does happen i'd imagine people will be fuming. Imagine getting a lovely new bus with wireless charging/usb/tables....then getting seats without a head rest and nothing else.

(02 Sep 2021, 12:49 pm)Keeiajs wrote Yeah I mean, to get buses which are 12 years older. With i don't even think Wifi is a massive downgrade, and if that does happen i'd imagine people will be fuming. Imagine getting a lovely new bus with wireless charging/usb/tables....then getting seats without a head rest and nothing else.

I have a friend who uses the X47 to get to and from work every day, and when I told her she'd probably be losing the new buses she wasn't happy like!

She complained when one of the Diamond B5s turned up instead of a StreetDeck last night!

(02 Sep 2021, 12:57 pm)streetdeckfan wrote I have a friend who uses the X47 to get to and from work every day, and when I told her she'd probably be losing the new buses she wasn't happy like!

She complained when one of the Diamond B5s turned up instead of a StreetDeck last night!

I don't blame her, especially when it is advertised as XLINES.

(02 Sep 2021, 1:13 pm)Keeiajs wrote I don't blame her, especially when it is advertised as XLINES.

Except the 47 isnt advertised X-Lines now,its Red Kite Ranger

GNE prob wouldn't have to make so many cuts if drivers were trying to discourage ridership. One of my friends just had a driver on the 30 saying that him and other drivers think it's a big no-no for him (and other people) to go riding around on buses as there's a pandemic. All he did was wanted a return from Stanley to Lanchester to tick off 6916.

Do passengers really complain that much whether or not a bus is new or how old it is? I'm not denying passengers could be saying this but at one time people where not that bothered so much about a bus' age just as long as it was reliable, got them where they wanted, it was safe and comfortable enough. There were buses like the MCW Metrobuses and Leyland Olympians that were running on main stream services up until around the mid noughties and they must have been getting on for 25-30 years old by the time they were withdrawn. These buses were more reliable than some of the newer models at the time. Now if anyone says a bus is 10 years or older that they are old! I know that GNE and other operators are expected to meet emissons targets every year but it just shows sadly that a lot of stuff now isn't built to last as long and thats such a shame given the millions of pounds invested in new buses year on year. I was at Seaburn rally on Monday and it was a joy to see stuff like the Metrobuses and Olympians etc which are still as solid as a rock.

(02 Sep 2021, 3:46 pm)Washingtonian wrote Do passengers really complain that much whether or not a bus is new or how old it is? I'm not denying passengers could be saying this but at one time people where not that bothered so much about a bus' age just as long as it was reliable, got them where they wanted, it was safe and comfortable enough. There were buses like the MCW Metrobuses and Leyland Olympians that were running on main stream services up until around the mid noughties and they must have been getting on for 25-30 years old by the time they were withdrawn. These buses were more reliable than some of the newer models at the time. Now if anyone says a bus is 10 years or older that they are old! I know that GNE and other operators are expected to meet emissons targets every year but it just shows sadly that a lot of stuff now isn't built to last as long and thats such a shame given the millions of pounds invested in new buses year on year. I was at Seaburn rally on Monday and it was a joy to see stuff like the Metrobuses and Olympians etc which are still as solid as a rock.

I think if they've been used to a new bus on their route and all of a sudden get a much older one, then it's likely to wind people up a bit.

Sent from my moto g(8) power lite using Tapatalk

(02 Sep 2021, 3:54 pm)big mac wrote I think if they've been used to a new bus on their route and all of a sudden get a much older one, then it's likely to wind people up a bit.

Sent from my moto g(8) power lite using Tapatalk

It's exactly that. My friend either gets the 10A or the X47, so she isn't exactly opposed to a 62 plate bus. It's the fact that the route was upgraded to X-Lines with the fancy new buses, and then demoted back down within the space of a year!

IMO, the 47 should never have been X-Lines in the first place.

(02 Sep 2021, 3:46 pm)Washingtonian wrote Do passengers really complain that much whether or not a bus is new or how old it is? I'm not denying passengers could be saying this but at one time people where not that bothered so much about a bus' age just as long as it was reliable, got them where they wanted, it was safe and comfortable enough. There were buses like the MCW Metrobuses and Leyland Olympians that were running on main stream services up until around the mid noughties and they must have been getting on for 25-30 years old by the time they were withdrawn. These buses were more reliable than some of the newer models at the time. Now if anyone says a bus is 10 years or older that they are old! I know that GNE and other operators are expected to meet emissons targets every year but it just shows sadly that a lot of stuff now isn't built to last as long and thats such a shame given the millions of pounds invested in new buses year on year. I was at Seaburn rally on Monday and it was a joy to see stuff like the Metrobuses and Olympians etc which are still as solid as a rock.

I wont lie,i complained loads when they shoved the old solos on the Little Coasters

(02 Sep 2021, 2:53 pm)V514DFT wrote Except the 47 isnt advertised X-Lines now,its Red Kite Ranger

True, however to go from XLINES to a 12 years old bus. Why do that.Are they even staying.

(02 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm)streetdeckfan wrote It's exactly that. My friend either gets the 10A or the X47, so she isn't exactly opposed to a 62 plate bus. It's the fact that the route was upgraded to X-Lines with the fancy new buses, and then demoted back down within the space of a year!

IMO, the 47 should never have been X-Lines in the first place.

The X45 and X46 shouldn't be either, really, as it's only a small section of the route that's non-stop. I don't think you can stick an X on the front of a service number unless it's limited stop for the majority of its route.

Sent from my moto g(8) power lite using Tapatalk

That's fair enough and I can see where you are all coming from, particularly about new buses being replaced with much older ones not long after receiving an upgrade. I do think however it would be nice to see new buses that are bought being placed on a route and it lasting on that route for a decent period of time. I think the duration the buses have generally lasted on the 4 and X1 are about right, with upgrades every 10 years or so. That;s fair enough for the core routes really. Suppose that's just the way I am really as I get attached to certain buses and find it a bit sad when they move on. I was a bit disappointed when they moved the B9s on from the X1 as I always loved a ride on those.

(01 Sep 2021, 9:37 pm)Keeiajs wrote So what is GNE's ebus plans. Personally after the investment Consett has gotten they should stay away from that for atleast 4 years.

Contrary to popular believe, GNE don't have a money tree in the car park at Queen Street, so I wouldn't get over-excited about investment beyond what has gone into changing the network for beyond this week. I'd imagine like most companies, Go Ahead Group's cheque book being opened will largely depend on customer levels returning close to pre-pandemic levels, whether that be by the return of previous travel plans or the encouraging of new travel plans, through incentives like the £1 evening fare offer.

(02 Sep 2021, 12:57 pm)streetdeckfan wrote I have a friend who uses the X47 to get to and from work every day, and when I told her she'd probably be losing the new buses she wasn't happy like!

She complained when one of the Diamond B5s turned up instead of a StreetDeck last night!

I have some sympathy and I think this is a problem with overselling. There's that much focus put into how good Xlines is (and I do think its something they should shout about), that when anything else turns up, it's chalk and cheese from what you've been used to. I'd say evening X30 customers probably think the same, when there's a few runs picked up by Riverside using 10+ year old buses. Not ideal.

(02 Sep 2021, 3:19 pm)Rapidsnap wrote GNE prob wouldn't have to make so many cuts if drivers were trying to discourage ridership. One of my friends just had a driver on the 30 saying that him and other drivers think it's a big no-no for him (and other people) to go riding around on buses as there's a pandemic. All he did was wanted a return from Stanley to Lanchester to tick off 6916.

That's a bit alarming if drivers are trying to discourage ridership. The company's message is that it is safe to travel, there's no restrictions on doing so, so their personal opinions shouldn't be coming into play. If someone wants to pay their money to 'tick off' a bus, then that is up to them.

(02 Sep 2021, 3:46 pm)Washingtonian wrote Do passengers really complain that much whether or not a bus is new or how old it is? I'm not denying passengers could be saying this but at one time people where not that bothered so much about a bus' age just as long as it was reliable, got them where they wanted, it was safe and comfortable enough. There were buses like the MCW Metrobuses and Leyland Olympians that were running on main stream services up until around the mid noughties and they must have been getting on for 25-30 years old by the time they were withdrawn. These buses were more reliable than some of the newer models at the time. Now if anyone says a bus is 10 years or older that they are old! I know that GNE and other operators are expected to meet emissons targets every year but it just shows sadly that a lot of stuff now isn't built to last as long and thats such a shame given the millions of pounds invested in new buses year on year. I was at Seaburn rally on Monday and it was a joy to see stuff like the Metrobuses and Olympians etc which are still as solid as a rock.

I personally don't mind an older vehicle (say 15 years old) as long as it meets the specification promised on the route.

If I'm getting the X21, I expect to get a bus with high-back seats, WiFi, USB ports and tables as that is what is advertised. Anything less I consider to be false advertising.
If you go to McDonalds and order a Big Mac, and get given a saver menu hamburger, you wouldn't be happy. If they turn around and say "well, it's still food", you'd tell them to shove it. So why is it alright for an operator to turn around and says "it's still a bus" and that's the end of it?

As for the likes of the Olympians, the reason they're still 'solid as a rock' is because people will have spent far more than the vehicle is worth restoring them, and keeping them on the road!

(02 Sep 2021, 7:16 pm)streetdeckfan wrote I personally don't mind an older vehicle (say 15 years old) as long as it meets the specification promised on the route.

If I'm getting the X21, I expect to get a bus with high-back seats, WiFi, USB ports and tables as that is what is advertised. Anything less I consider to be false advertising.
If you go to McDonalds and order a Big Mac, and get given a saver menu hamburger, you wouldn't be happy. If they turn around and say "well, it's still food", you'd tell them to shove it. So why is it alright for an operator to turn around and says "it's still a bus" and that's the end of it?

As for the likes of the Olympians, the reason they're still 'solid as a rock' is because people will have spent far more than the vehicle is worth restoring them, and keeping them on the road!

I would rather get 6334/5 over the 67' Plates ngl.

(02 Sep 2021, 5:43 pm)Washingtonian wrote That's fair enough and I can see where you are all coming from, particularly about new buses being replaced with much older ones not long after receiving an upgrade. I do think however it would be nice to see new buses that are bought being placed on a route and it lasting on that route for a decent period of time. I think the duration the buses have generally lasted on the 4 and X1 are about right, with upgrades every 10 years or so. That;s fair enough for the core routes really. Suppose that's just the way I am really as I get attached to certain buses and find it a bit sad when they move on. I was a bit disappointed when they moved the B9s on from the X1 as I always loved a ride on those.

I think it's more about downgrading rather than age. Like I live up Blyth way and we have the Gemini's and tbh they're perfectly fine and I have no problems with them. Now if you gave us brand new buses with tables which have a nicer interior etc. I wouldn't be too happy to then get the Gemini's back a year later while the other Blyth bus routes keep there brand new buses because they want to move them to Ashington for the X21/X22 instead while I still pay the same price as the other punters with their brand new buses (which would be actually more here because of Coastliner and Cramlington discounts).

Like in your case you didn't want the B9's to go but next year you probably wouldn't want them back either when you've had brand new Streetdecks for the past 2 year.

Also whoever mentioned the old Metrobuses/Olympians in the 00's they were mid 80's buses if I'm right so no older than the 03/04 plate Omnidekkas running around now.

(02 Sep 2021, 7:18 pm)Keeiajs wrote I would rather get 6334/5 over the 67' Plates ngl.

Nah, if given the choice I'd take one of the 67 plates. I rely on the 240v sockets too much and typically use my laptop to get some work done so the tables are pretty much essential, and I much prefer sitting backwards anyway!
6334/5 seem to have got worse since I last used them, I think it was 6335 I was on last and couldn't hear my self think because of the rattles!

(02 Sep 2021, 7:16 pm)streetdeckfan wrote I personally don't mind an older vehicle (say 15 years old) as long as it meets the specification promised on the route.

If I'm getting the X21, I expect to get a bus with high-back seats, WiFi, USB ports and tables as that is what is advertised. Anything less I consider to be false advertising.
If you go to McDonalds and order a Big Mac, and get given a saver menu hamburger, you wouldn't be happy. If they turn around and say "well, it's still food", you'd tell them to shove it. So why is it alright for an operator to turn around and says "it's still a bus" and that's the end of it?

As for the likes of the Olympians, the reason they're still 'solid as a rock' is because people will have spent far more than the vehicle is worth restoring them, and keeping them on the road!

Wouldnt it be the case of big macs arent available at the moment, so choose something else from the menu...

(02 Sep 2021, 7:43 pm)JP6004 wrote Wouldnt it be the case of big macs arent available at the moment, so choose something else from the menu...

No, that would be like not running the X21 at all and saying to get the Arriva 6

(02 Sep 2021, 7:47 pm)streetdeckfan wrote No, that would be like not running the X21 at all and saying to get the Arriva 6

No that would be like mcdonalds telling you to go to KFC

(02 Sep 2021, 7:43 pm)JP6004 wrote Wouldnt it be the case of big macs arent available at the moment, so choose something else from the menu...

There is a bit of a difference, you arn't promised a big mac they don't say there will always be big macs The X21 is advertsied as tables/wifi. BigMac doesn’t say always be avaialble.

With a bit jigging around, the allocations for the 47/47A and 25 could easily be 6x StreetDecks & 6x B9TLs.

(02 Sep 2021, 8:21 pm)L469 YVK wrote With a bit jigging around, the allocations for the 47/47A and 25 could easily be 6x StreetDecks & 6x B9TLs.

Hope the 25 gets double deckers as I think it does require them.

Sent from my moto g(8) power lite using Tapatalk

(02 Sep 2021, 8:39 pm)big mac wrote Hope the 25 gets double deckers as I think it does require them. 

Sent from my moto g(8) power lite using Tapatalk

I don't think the 25 needs double deckers, Versa's are perfectly fine But they do need Euro 6.

(02 Sep 2021, 8:39 pm)big mac wrote Hope the 25 gets double deckers as I think it does require them. 

Sent from my moto g(8) power lite using Tapatalk

MG did say that the 25 would receive refreshed DD later in year