LeeCalder 13 Apr 2022, 9:46 am #31 LeeCalder LeeCalder LeeCalder Posts: 1928 Threads: 14 Joined: Oct 2014 Reputation: 0 RE: 6331 6332 6333 (13 Apr 2022, 9:01 am)F114TML wrote That is not pleasant - very dazzling and somewhat distracting. So it's served it's purpose then? Reply
Unber43 13 Apr 2022, 12:54 pm #32 Unber43 Unber43 Unber43 Posts: 3619 Threads: 57 Joined: Mar 2022 Reputation: 1 RE: 6331 6332 6333 (13 Apr 2022, 9:46 am)LeeCalder wrote So it's served it's purpose then?If I saw it, I would probs be like what on earth is that and look away not evening seeing the "ads" on the side. Its more of a eye sore Reply
F114TML 13 Apr 2022, 1:04 pm #33 F114TML F114TML F114TML Posts: 1026 Threads: 0 Joined: Feb 2022 Reputation: 0 RE: 6331 6332 6333 (13 Apr 2022, 9:46 am)LeeCalder wrote So it's served it's purpose then?Yes, but I don't think it's a good idea to make drivers look away from the road for an extended period? Reply
Chris 1 13 Apr 2022, 2:13 pm #34 Chris 1 Chris 1 Chris 1 Posts: 267 Threads: 2 Joined: Jan 2018 Reputation: 1 RE: 6331 6332 6333 Purely subjective, of course, I think it looks ok. Not sure I'd say it was distracting though, if a few zigzags cause a motorist to look away from the road for an extended period I'd question their suitability to be behind the wheel in first place. Reply