(23 Apr 2015, 5:36 pm)Michael wrote 1 review: Batteries are shit in all Galaxy phones after a while. 

That's one disadvantage to the new Galaxy S6. They're no longer using a removable battery as per its predecessors.

I think Samsung said in a press release that it should definitely last a year or two before there's any noticeable loss of battery life in the new S6's battery, but they're offering a service to replace the batteries at a cost of around £35. Those who opt for the high-end flagship phones tend to renew their phones after 2 years, anyway, so it shouldn't be too much of an issue.

To be honest, after you've spent £600+ on the phone, a replacement battery after a year costing £35 is nothing. Even those who hand the phone down to a family member or friend afterwards can enjoy the S6 in two years time if it's got a replacement battery.

(23 Apr 2015, 5:42 pm)Tommy_1581 wrote Crap.

What makes you think this?

The specification of the new Galaxy S6 easily makes the phone one of the best flagship mobile phones on the market right now.

The design of previous Galaxy S range models has been criticised, though the S6 has adopted an 'Applesque' design, making it a little more easier on the eye. Gone are the days of a flagship being made out of plastic - the latest Gorilla Glass is the present and future! The S6 Edge looks even better than the S6, but sadly isn't worth paying an extra £150 for as it doesn't add a great deal of functionality.