I dont think any of them are fit for government, Cameron has now lost face in front of the world, then theres his bitch, I mean Nick Clegg, I would not trust to care for a dog and Ed Milliband, there is something I dont like about him, I always thought his brother would have been a better choice for the leadership, if better choice is the right words.
As for 'Blue' Labour one of the most accurate things Margaret Thatcher ever said, when she was asked something like 'What is your legacy' she replied 'New Labour'. If the Lib Dems had any sense, they would look to break the Coalition as Cameron has lost his party now in my opinion, breaking Coalition agreement would almost certainly trigger a General Election and Cameron could try and fight for a parliamentary majority and and try to get a mandate.
Bashar Assad is a bad man, no two ways about it, but the rebels are no angels, and have possibly committed atrocities themselves, and by supporting the Rebels any intervening Armed Forces are on the same side as al-Qaeda, Hezbollah and Iran as they have been supporting Syrian Government Opposition and we all know what happened in the 80's when backing Rebel Groups in Afghanstan, the mujahideen the West armed, evolved into the Taliban and al-Qaeda. once that was over Bin Laden turned his site on the US, and America was even arming Iran in the 80's while there Iraqi opposition at the same time(Iran-Contra Affair, I think it was named.
Well, on a lighter note, people are claiming this could trigger World War 3, if it does, we should stay neutral, then turn up 2 and a half years later and go on to claim we won it
Syria
Poll: Should The West intervene in Syria
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
1 (10.00%)
No
8 (80.00%)
Couldn't Give a Monkeys Toss
1 (10.00%)
* You voted for this item.
Total: 10 vote(s) (100%)
Syria
RE: Syria
•
by MrFozz
•
30 Aug 2013, 6:58 pm