(02 Dec 2015, 7:36 pm)Andreos1 wrote The perspective shown on RT is totally different to the stuff put out by the print and broadcast media.The 'Terrorist Sympathiser' was beyond disgusting, it was vile and Cameron may have lost some votes by making that comment...
Whether the media are targeting Corbyn directly or feeding the ignorance of the public, who knows.
Maybe it is both?
Hopefully they fail to realise the public can see between the lines and realise the daily attacks on him, are unjustified.
Cameron calling those who oppose the bombing, 'terrorist sympathisers', is where the media need to direct their attention.
That comment was disgusting.
Is saying that about someone not Slanderous or does Parliamentary Privilige give an MP the right to say whatever the hell they want.
I don't like Corbyn, I dont know why, I just dont, but the campaign against is getting too personal and masty, but I respect him for sticking to his guns(no pun intended) on this and not once changing his mind.
It is good that we have a Parliament that requires a vote on these issues rather a government that tells us what is happening whether we like it or not.
Cameron can't really win on this, damned if he does, damned if he doesn't, it doesn't matter how the vote goes, Cameron will get it in the neck either way...
What happens next, I do not know, is it inevitable that ground force will have to be assembled and in what form would that be? UN-led, NATO Led or Arab League Led, and ultimately who are we aligned with in this?
We could argue this till were blue in the face and still not come up with a resolution to the problem