(27 Sep 2013, 3:53 pm)Andreos1 wrote Anything to do with the conversation on here in late August?
It appears to be a separate issue to the one in the August conversation having said that the item from August is covered in another section of the report that was issued on 20th September. The result in the case of Mr Shipley was "Repute not lost under article 6 of the Regulation".