You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.

Skip to main content

Deliberately downgrading a flagship route

Deliberately downgrading a flagship route

RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
(21 May 2022, 1:07 pm)peter wrote There's no chance any of those B5's are gonna get withdrawn at 10 years old, they're nowhere near the age of being 'uneconomical to repair.' 

Hasn't it already been established that the reliability of the B5's on the X21 isn't as bad as has been made out...6332/33 being allocated to Chester-le-Street so there are decent spares would be sufficient I'm sure. 

I think it could go either way at Consett. I think 6362/3 will go to Washington for the X1 like you say. As for 6356-6361, the paint is still fresh on those 47/47A B9's, doesn't mean it won't happen tho. Part of me does wonder if the new 24 could be a contender with a PVR of 5. Alternatively if 6356-61 stay for the X45, some of the MMC's could be released to Riverside for something like the 58.


I can't see GNE taking the commercial risk of a new route when they can hardly run the routes they do have! 
I often wonder if that's led to the situation we see now.
It's easy to blame covid, changing travel patterns, drivers being enticed elsewhere (whether that be new jobs or football matches) and whatever else - but the lockdowns were the ideal opportunity to revise and revisit everything.

There's been many opportunities in the past and they've seemingly been ignored in favour of doing what they do best.
'Illegitimis non carborundum'

Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route
RE: Deliberately downgrading a flagship route