You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.

Skip to main content

Reversing the decline in passenger numbers

Reversing the decline in passenger numbers

RE: Go North East - 2023 Pay Deal and Industrial Action
(28 Oct 2023, 11:15 pm)Andreos1 wrote There's no social housing at all in Portobello (not that it's an actual place, it lends it's name to a road, industrial estate and a school). 
Car usage is high across Vigo (where I think you're referring to) and it's all private housing.

It's been awful since it was built in the 60s and 70s and other than the 23 that served the older part of the estate and variations of the 82/83 in recent years, there's not been a bus service that's penetrated the estate ever.

Ah just realised those weird block houses off Portsmead Road aren't, always thought they were. Similar to some where I live and they are up here.

It's a strange area as it's very similar to Stakeford and the West end of Ashington in terms of housing. The only difference is one can somehow manage 3 buses an hour with investment every other year and is actually above pre Covid levels and the other doesn't have anything.

I don't really sell of the car excuse anyway tbh. Cramlington can somehow manage a bus service and so can Kingston Park with it's 4 express buses an hour and that's all 1970's/1980's car in mind housing or Ponteland and it's 2 BPH.

Density of course I agree, running 4 BPH to Consett via a bunch of villages is always going to have it's problems, but these are pretty much urban and sub urban routes areas throughout.

(28 Oct 2023, 11:24 pm)Unber43 wrote Consett had the best network going after the Sept 2021 changes. 

The only thing I would change is the 47 one went to Castleside the other went to Shotley Bridge, and the X5 went to Castleside and X15 went to Shotley Bridge I think that would have been better. 

Aswell I was out early, and I was thinking with ISquared taking over Arriva, when Arriva goes in for pay negotations it could either go one way DB not wanting to talk at all, or they just give them whatever they want as theyll only be in control for maybe 6 months, however if they do the former and the drivers go out on a walk out, it might give GNE or SCNE (presumably GNE solve their dispute) to maybe purchase a depot from Arriva as they dont care theyve just sold the company, they dont want to pay their workers anymore, sell Belmont or Blyth/Ashington to GNE/SCNE make some money.

Also it is intresting that the amount of people learning to drive is reducing year upon year and that is going to have to lead to more use in public transport, that change hast to start now in crafting a network which is good, I would say pre-Sept 2021 changes GNE network was one of the best its ever been atleast in the past 10 years, they really tried, but I no one knew about it really. No one looks oooo lets see whats happening on Go North East, they need to market, I remember DAn sayign there was a big marketing push when Driver Shortage was over in the East Gateshead area, look how taht is now its only the EG Rider left.

And I think thats something else Branding, its unique to GNE yes, its perhaps not needed but it gives a route an identity, I cannot believe what happened to the Loops, there was no need to brand then East Gateshead Loop considering they spend half their time in west gateshead, same with the Orbits. Branding is something that should stay in my opinion but for it to work you need a solid network, just look at the failures with S&D.

For me most services should be branded...I know this is unpopular but I think the only services which should be unbranded is

25 (PVR 2)
34 (maybe, it does get busy)
41/41A (too many changes in NT)
99 (contracted runs 4 each day each way)
most few daily contracted services aswell
Why not brand the 701/702/703 - Chester-Le-Street Town Services.

Go back to old branding Simplicity, Silver Arrows, CityLink (58/57), no need for EG. Just the nromal Loop. for heaven sakes the Drifters flagship route has had no TLC for 10 years. Also the NTR what a joke "look out for a purple bus" theres more red and blue ones than purple, when theyre runnig that is, infact theyre the only service running and you see more coasters on them I mean FFS

But for branding to mean something you have focus on it, it means not allocating routes everywhere, it means sticking to spares being the 2019 lvieries buses only, no Prince Bishops popping up on the 700, or 60's spending more time in South tyneside. And the buses have to reliabile i mean just look at the state of the TVT, and there are going to be no new buses for years just old awful ex-london spec with rock hard seats, no USBs or anything, nothing to make people feel a reason to get the bus, "oh i can get a charge" "oh we can get a table" and I know that was one of my reasons to get the bus, but especially with the unreability of the fleet and the ex-london buses which are awful inside and wouldnt want to go on them.

Gonna reply in the other thread as it fits there better.

Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: The decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: Reversing the decline in passenger numbers
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: September Service Changes
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East: Service Suggestions v2
RE: Go North East - 2023 Pay Deal and Industrial Action