(20 Jun 2024, 4:40 pm)L469 YVK wrote Headache job, but got a PVR of 12x for the X30/X31/X32 and X70/X71/X73

X70 NCL > X30 STY > X32 NCL > X71 CON (PVR 4)

X71 NCL > X32 STY > X30 NCL > X31 STY > X31 NCL > X73 STY > X73 NCL > X70 CON (PVR 8 with remote reliefs in Stanley)

X45 looks to be going standalone with a PVR of 5x. Looking at the E400s, leaves 4x spare but not enough to cover the X45 standalone PVR of 4x

Unless the X20 looses 6308-14? And then if none or very few VOR's affecting the low bridge issue / Euro 6 issue......any surplus E400s & B5TLs allocated to the X5/X15

To me it looks like there are 3 main options. 

Option 1 the X30/31/32 interwork with a PVR of 5 and the X70/71/73 interwork with a PVR of 6 for a total of 11 this is the most efficient in terms of vehicles but would require all to be low height for the bridge in Dunston and remote reliefs in Stanley.

Option 2 everything interworks with a total PVR of 12. No remote reliefs in Stanley but again all would need to be low height for the bridge in Dunston.

Option 3 X30/31/32 interworks with a PVR of 5, X70/73 interwork with an PVR of 5 and the X71 runs standalone with a PVR of 3 for a total PVR of 13. This would need remote reliefs in Stanley but limit the number of low height needed to 8.

I’ve added pictures to show how the timings would work for each of the above.