You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.

Skip to main content

RE: Controversial Services
(26 Jul 2014, 9:12 pm)Marcus wrote This photo seems to disagree; (although it was taken in 2000)

https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/8050359@N0...D_w_IS_all

Here it is, but with X20/X50 branding;

https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/rpbsp/1367...D_w_IS_all

So yeah, I guess Scanias were the allocation Smile

The X20 and X50 were the reason Scanias 5229-5233 were purchased...

Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
RE: Controversial Services
Controversial Services