What's on the 67/69 today?

Nothings tracking

Edit:

Nvm found it on the GNE tracker on their site.


6974 on the 67
3941/3943 is on the 69


------


What fleet movements has took place today with the service changes?

(21 Jul 2024, 5:37 pm)Michael wrote What's on the 67/69 today?

Nothings tracking

Edit:

Nvm found it on the GNE tracker on their site.


6974 on the 67
3941/3943 is on the 69


------


What fleet movements has took place today with the service changes?

Good to know that the 67/69 didn't have a destination board either and ran using the good old paper dest in the window

(21 Jul 2024, 5:37 pm)Michael wrote What's on the 67/69 today?

Nothings tracking

Edit:

Nvm found it on the GNE tracker on their site.


6974 on the 67
3941/3943 is on the 69


------


What fleet movements has took place today with the service changes?

Double deckers on the 67 and 69 seems overkill but the state of Riverside might mean they are the only functioning buses they have…

(21 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm)Ambassador wrote Double deckers on the 67 and 69 seems overkill but the state of Riverside might mean they are the only functioning buses they have…

Apparently the buses used today didn't even have the destinations for the 67/69 programmed. 

How are they incapable of getting even the basics right?

(21 Jun 2024, 3:26 pm)User2613 wrote To me it looks like there are 3 main options. 

Option 1 the X30/31/32 interwork with a PVR of 5 and the X70/71/73 interwork with a PVR of 6 for a total of 11 this is the most efficient in terms of vehicles but would require all to be low height for the bridge in Dunston and remote reliefs in Stanley.

Looks like Option 1 is what GNE have went with looking at bus times, clicking on vehicles and checking the future trips.

On a debate note.....is it cheaper for GNE to have 1x less bus albeit the remote reliefs in Stanley? Or would it be cheaper to increase the PVR by 1x and have all reliefs in Consett with the X45 thrown back into the interworking pattern?

Unless GNE are using the bait room in Stanley, 5 hours on the X30/X31/X32 is pushing it and the only efficient driving time GNE would get without pushing it is around 3hr20m. Not forgetting the cost & time of transporting drivers from Hownsgill to Stanley.

Enviro 200mmc seem to be allocated to the Xlines services, whilst the 6 seems to have adopted a few deckers including all the Ex yorkshire ones.

(23 Jul 2024, 5:32 pm)WestDurhamSwift wrote Enviro 200mmc seem to be allocated to the Xlines services, whilst the 6 seems to have adopted a few deckers including all the Ex yorkshire ones.

Wouldn't have that problem having to allocate singles if the X32 was increased to 2x per hour (with X31 dropped), Lobley Hill Estate swapped with the X70, and X45 re-joined into the interworking pattern. Only the X30 & X71 would require a low height decker (PVR 4).

X45 > X73 > X32 > X45 (PVR 4.5)
X45 > X32 > X73 > X45 (PVR 4.5)
X70 > X32 > X32 > X70 (PVR 4)
X71 > X30 > X30 > X71 (PVR 4)

Yes an extra bus in the PVR but driving hours & reliefs far more efficient.

Although it would give the option should GNE need it (i.e X9 re-introduced), it wouldn't necessarily mean E400MMC's leaving Consett. If anything, would give a hell of a lot flexibility covering VOR's.

39 still displaying biddick woods estate oh dear ?