(21 Dec 2013, 11:37 am)Dan wrote Surprised to see a day-time running of the "Sunderland Connect" 701 service.
Every time I've photographed the service, it has been empty...
Assume 628 will be allocated during this time? Will bring the PVR up to 4, rather than 3...
Nexus likes to waste money though!
(21 Dec 2013, 4:33 pm)busmanT wrote The inter peak journeys on the 701 are needed due to the large number of students travelling on the 700, and will be operated by the single deck bus that does scholars 458 morning and afternoon
(20 Dec 2013, 9:35 pm)Rob wrote The reliability of those routes appears to be frequently brought to the attention of Go North East Customer Services on the Facebook page, so an issue is evident. If vehicles are required to improve reliability, single decked vehicles are the only vehicles presently available in the fleet. Would it therefore be worthwhile to allocate more reliable single decked vehicles to the West Durham routes? While such vehicles would marginally decrease the total carrying capacity, it would boost reliability.
(21 Dec 2013, 11:01 pm)GMitchelhill wrote Drove around the edge of the new Riverside depot and note that the depot is now complete and all contractor vehicles seem to have departed. The reception area was lit up and looked very smart.
Additionally, judging by the crash barriers, the buses will be parked at right angles to the depot building as per Walkergate depot.
(22 Dec 2013, 9:14 am)Dan wrote Ready for their first day of operation at Riverside when the VOSA registration changes take place.
(22 Dec 2013, 10:38 am)Michael wrote Also February seems a long time to leave it empty, is none of the admin etc people not moving in earlier?
(22 Dec 2013, 10:49 am)citaro5284 wrote Not really. Remember it is a new build, all the network equipment has to be installed and tested, all computers need to be installed, all of the furniture (desks/cabinets etc) need to be set up, so there is quite a bit of work to do, don't think because GNE have the keys it can be operational from day 1.
(22 Dec 2013, 1:00 pm)CatsFast101 wrote Monday maybe? If I recall correctly wasn't the first CityLink Versa out midweek?
(22 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm)Kuyoyo wrote To be completely frank here, the best idea would be wait until the new year to place the B9s out on the 56. Gives the depot more chance to get the driver type-trained and to make sure everything works (WiFi, 'next stop' announcement) before placing them into public service.
(22 Dec 2013, 1:37 pm)CatsFast101 wrote Well originally the B9's were meant to be out before Christmas so they've been delayed sightly. Now with Christmas etc, as has been said Januray may be the best Time to launch.
(22 Dec 2013, 1:38 pm)Dan wrote Why? Because of a delay in arrival from Wrights.
The original date for the B9s to enter service was 15/12.
(22 Dec 2013, 1:45 pm)Dan wrote Hahaha... Is that a joke?
(22 Dec 2013, 3:22 pm)Tom wrote Possibly a replacement for 8228 at Hexham?
(22 Dec 2013, 4:08 pm)CatsFast101 wrote That sounds like a good idea, although what is the point in the 'Cobalt Spare' I don't really understand the need for it? It's not actually getting replaced by new vehicles so it maybe retained at Percy Main. Isn't 4911 in a different livery, it seems like a wasted vehicle?
(22 Dec 2013, 4:21 pm)Wellsey18 wrote well like any other spare branded vehicle its used when a cobalt clippers off the road, which with them being repainted is helpful at the moment, and I'm sure its something to do with the contract with cobalt that cobalt gets advertised on whatever bus works 309/310 however sometimes this doesn't happen