(21 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm)roar wrote Must agree with citaro5284 here, the two can not be compared. Metro is running on rail's, only thing that gets in its way is other metro's or national rail trains between Pelaw and Sunderland. Buses have traffic to deal with, tickets to issue, customers to enquires to deal with. And the worst at the moment is incompetent council's, non-existant parking control, poor bus stop positioning and just poor planning.
Just to give a few examples of the problems buses face in Sunderland due to council involvement
No traffic control on Vine Place/Holmeside or at other problem areas like Pallion, Southwick ect.
Traffic lights that are set up against buses. John Street to West Wear street is on green then when they change to red the lights that take you onto Wearmouth bridge change from green to red, then the confusion to deal with from other drivers as the traffic lights here are signaled as NO RIGHT TURN so effectively nothing should then turn right onto Wearmouth Bridge. Badly positioned bus stop infrastructure, bus stops positioned that close to the curb its impossible to pull up at the bus stop close to the curb because the bus stop pole, shelter or other street furniture will either remove the near side mirror or miss judge you position by an inch and your scrapping the front corner of the bus.
Anyway enough about that and back on subject of the Tyne and Wear metro. Nexus only franchised it out because they new it was about to crumble. DB were basically given a spanner to try and tighten a screw, why is nobody shouting for nexus to take back control??? The only thing that should have happened was that they should have been made to sell it into private ownership. DB, First, Go-Ahead, Stagecoach or any of the other private transport company's would have made the system make a profit, anyone that says they couldn't is just saying the system will never be profitable and we as tax payers will constantly be paying to try and make something work that never will.
But we're talking about a gap in service from a customer perspective here? The two can be compared, as the only reference point is punctuality.
Traffic congestion or leaves on the track aren't going to make a blind bit of difference to your average customer. If either a train or a bus is timetabled at a set time, then the customer expectation is it arrives at that time. If there are regular issues creating a gap in the timetable, then they need to be addressed. It's basic problem management.
I think as enthusiasts, we're too quick to look at then nitty gritty as to why a service is late, and try and use the reasons behind it as valid reasoning. I'm not saying that's right or wrong, but the businesses exist because there's a customer base using them. The regular customer quite frankly doesn't give a toss
why, but more what the operator is going to do to prevent it happening.
Homeside/Vine Place has had congestion issues for years. I doubt the lights timing for John Street to West Wear Street has changed in the past few years either. Shouldn't timetables be adjusted to reflect this? My experience are that most running times are quite tight at the best of times. One of the X1s I used yesterday was late, and the driver was trying to make up time by putting their foot down along Old Durham Road. Going through 3 red lights between The Galleries and Gateshead Interchange in the process. This is ridiculous, and there should never be a need for a driver to have to put their licence at risk. I see the same on my local Arriva routes during peak times too.
Quite interested to see your factual sources for the Metro system being about to crumble? I'm not necessarily disagreeing with what you're saying at this stage, but it's quite a claim to make without putting a source to it? You may want to back it up by telling us about the grand work those private companies do in the rail industry, and about how little subsidy they take from the tax payer?