https://play.google.com/store/apps/detai...ulator2015
Downloaded it earlier and it seems pretty good
![Smile Smile](https://northeastbuses.co.uk/images/smilies/smile.png)
Skip to main content
(15 Mar 2015, 8:13 pm)mb134 wrote Has anyone else seen this :
https://play.google.com/store/apps/detai...ulator2015
Downloaded it earlier and it seems pretty goodLot's of ad's between each level though, although you can easily skip them.
(03 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm)Jimmi wrote My dad bought a new phone today, it is a old fashioned Nokia brick thing with an actual keypad. If you want to know how old fashioned it is, it has Snake [emoji23]
(03 Apr 2015, 4:51 pm)MurdnunoC wrote There's nowt wrong with old Nokias. The fact that they're still in demand and use around fifteen years since they came onto the market should tell you all you need to know
(03 Apr 2015, 4:56 pm)Jimmi wrote That or some people really just really want to play Snake.
There good if you aren't really interested in Internet or any other fancy features and only want to use it purely as a mobile telephone which is why they are probably still around.
Some of these phones around today are too complicated for some people which is partly why some opt for the old simple styled phones.
(03 Apr 2015, 5:59 pm)aureolin wrote I remember having one of these. I think I'd have probably been in my last year at school?Think I had one a bit like this until I was about 15 [emoji1]
(03 Apr 2015, 6:03 pm)Jimmi wrote Think I had one a bit like this until I was about 15 [emoji1]
The Nokia 3310 is totally indestructible.
(03 Apr 2015, 6:06 pm)MurdnunoC wrote I still have a 3210 which I occasionally use when I'm at work.I had a 3210, 3310 and 3330 over time, between them went off so many walls, chucked on the ground, ended up in bits and still worked after I put them back together, my 3310 even fell into a couple of toilets and worked still when dried out...
It looks a bit battered but it's nothing a new casing wouldn't fix.
(04 Apr 2015, 9:17 am)Tommy_1581 wrote Mobile phones are so unnecessary these days.
Why do they need cameras, Internet, google and Microsoft office and games.
Who would want to take photos, publish them then print them on their phone. Why play some addictive game, that gives the company profit from cheats to bypass a level that can't be completed?
Buy a computer and buy an old Nokia.
(04 Apr 2015, 9:26 am)mb134 wrote It's so everything is in one place, making everything easier.Must admit, I kinda agree with Tommy, but I also agree with you, it is handy, I have a 13mp Camera which suits me, I play football manager and lets face it without mobiles of this kind there would be no NEB on the move
Most people these days will have a Smartphone of some kind, companies know this. Most phones are as powerful as some laptops, computers etc.
For the camera point, it saves buying an additional device for most people, my phone has a 20.7 MP camera, so for the few photos I do take this is more than adequate.
(04 Apr 2015, 10:26 am)MrFozz wrote Must admit, I kinda agree with Tommy, but I also agree with you, it is handy, I have a 13mp Camera which suits me, I play football manager and lets face it without mobiles of this kind there would be no NEB on the moveI wouldn't be replying to this is if my phone didn't have the Internet.
(23 Apr 2015, 5:33 pm)Dan wrote My new Samsung Galaxy S6 (64GB) was delivered earlier today. Transferring all the content from my old S4 to my new phone now, but will report back with my review later!
(23 Apr 2015, 5:36 pm)Michael wrote 1 review: Batteries are shit in all Galaxy phones after a while.
(23 Apr 2015, 5:42 pm)Tommy_1581 wrote Crap.
(23 Apr 2015, 10:05 pm)idiot wrote I can't justify spending that much money on a S6. I have an S3 still and bought an extended battery off Amazon, ive done a lot of emailing and texting today social media etc and its now just on 37%.
Other morning we had a bad morning association wise, and a colleuege in the association I'm in was on the phone as much as me - and his ipHone needed charging - whilst my S3 was still on 61%.
(23 Apr 2015, 5:42 pm)Tommy_1581 wrote Crap.Nothing wrong with Samsung...
(24 Apr 2015, 8:45 am)Andreos1 wrote Agreed on the cost.
I was very tempted with the Xperia aureolin suggested and even though I am mainly 'on the road' and need a decent phone, with decent spec - I couldn't justify spending that much money. Even though it would be doubling up as my office and I tried really hard to justify it, I couldn't.
If I worked 9-5 in an office, 5 days a week, 20 days a month - I would struggle even more to justify spending that much money on a phone. To spend all that money then not be able to use it for the majority of its contract, due to being behind a desk and having access to a computer and desk phone...
(25 Apr 2015, 8:53 pm)mb134 wrote @Dan
What's the battery life like on the S6, just been looking at some stats, and it appears to have a 2550mAH battery, while my Z1 (which is over a year older), has a 3000mAH, seems a bit strange that a phone with a larger processor, more RAM and a larger screen has a smaller battery?
I'm not against the S6 by any stretch, it just seems that from the outside the battery won't last as long? What are you predicted to get out of it?
(25 Apr 2015, 8:56 pm)aureolin wrote It surprised me when I seen that, but reviews claim that you'll get slightly better battery performance out of the S6 over the S5 for example? I assume something is drawing less power, and that's likely to be the screen.
(25 Apr 2015, 9:00 pm)mb134 wrote Aye, I'm not going against what reviews etc say, iI'm sure battery life will be good, however if people look at stats which I'm sure they often do, would they not start to query why?
Pretty sure it's you who has a Z1 as well? If so, have you noticed any difference in battery life with this "Project Volta"?![]()
(25 Apr 2015, 9:03 pm)aureolin wrote I haven't if I'm honest. I tend to get a full day out of the Xperia without it being on charge though, and I'd consider myself a heavy user. I'm forever doing something with it.No I haven't either