(10 May 2026, 7:44 pm)Dan wrote A Sprinter:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1GxAHTd...tid=wwXIfr
Any pics, I'm not on Facebook
Skip to main content
(10 May 2026, 7:44 pm)Dan wrote A Sprinter:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1GxAHTd...tid=wwXIfr
(11 May 2026, 9:37 pm)Rapidsnap wrote I went for the 520 today and it was running 43 seconds late. The driver was too friendly and was delaying the service by saying hello to every pensioner who got on. I think he was after their bingo winnings.
(11 May 2026, 9:37 pm)Rapidsnap wrote I went for the 520 today and it was running 43 seconds late. The driver was too friendly and was delaying the service by saying hello to every pensioner who got on. I think he was after their bingo winnings.
Nah in all seriousness, I photoed the 520 today, the vehicle looks smart and Lee looked as if he was enjoying himself, though that might be that his sanity might have departed as at the time of photoing, he would have already done 11 round trips or so between Houghton and Fencehouses.
(18 May 2026, 10:22 am)Nerd4321 wrote https://northstarbus.co.uk/news/article.php?id=45
(18 May 2026, 10:22 am)Nerd4321 wrote https://northstarbus.co.uk/news/article.php?id=45
(18 May 2026, 11:06 am)stagecoachbusdepot wrote Bit weird that they start on Saturday but bus times TBC
Forum Moderator | Let us know if you have any issues
Enjoy a new life down under…
(18 May 2026, 12:56 pm)tyresmoke wrote The timetables are now available on the Northstar website, and have been on Durham CC site for a little while.
(18 May 2026, 12:06 pm)BusLoverMum wrote This weekend is the bank Holiday weekend and start of half term.
(18 May 2026, 4:30 pm)stagecoachbusdepot wrote Still just says times TBC from what I can see https://www.durham.gov.uk/DurhamExplorer but great if they are on the operator website now, they weren't earlier. Hopefully will be a success.
(7 hours ago)Nerd4321 wrote https://northstarbus.co.uk/news/article.php?id=46
Propose to cancel X22
(7 hours ago)Nerd4321 wrote https://northstarbus.co.uk/news/article.php?id=46
Propose to cancel X22
(7 hours ago)Nerd4321 wrote https://northstarbus.co.uk/news/article.php?id=46
Propose to cancel X22
(3 hours ago)Malarkey wrote Proposal: Extend the 874 Time Traveller Line to Metrocentre
I've been looking at ways to strengthen the leisure network from Durham and wondered what people's thoughts would be on extending the current 874 beyond Beamish to provide a direct link to Chester-le-Street, Birtley and Metrocentre.
Proposed Route
874 Time Traveller Line
Durham Bus Station – Durham Rail Station – Bearpark – Ushaw – Witton Gilbert – Sacriston – Edmondsley – Grange Villa – Beamish Museum – Ouston – Barley Mow – Birtley – Metrocentre
Why?What about the X22?
- Creates a direct link from Durham to both Ushaw and Beamish Museum on the same service.
- Extends the route to another major leisure destination at Metrocentre, increasing its appeal to a wider range of passengers.
- Provides communities such as Bearpark, Witton Gilbert, Sacriston, Edmondsley and Grange Villa with a direct link to Metrocentre.
- Gives tourists staying in Durham an easy way to visit multiple attractions without needing to change buses.
- Creates a genuine cross-county leisure route linking heritage, culture, shopping and tourism.
With rising operating costs across the industry, there is a question over how sustainable it is to continue operating a standalone X22 solely between Chester-le-Street, Barley Mow, Birtley and Metrocentre, particularly if passenger numbers remain heavily concentrated on shopping trips.
Another factor is that the X22 no longer benefits from interworking with the X43 at Metrocentre. Instead, both services now require separate vehicle allocations, meaning two buses are tied up operating what are effectively two relatively niche routes. From an operational perspective, that can be difficult to justify when resources are under pressure and operators are looking to maximise vehicle utilisation.
By incorporating the X22 corridor into the 874, the same vehicle mileage could potentially serve a much wider market, attracting visitors to Ushaw and Beamish while also providing the Metrocentre connection. This could improve overall passenger loadings across the day rather than relying on a relatively short shopping route to generate demand on its own. It may also allow for more efficient vehicle deployment by combining leisure, tourism and shopping flows onto a single route.
(3 hours ago)Malarkey wrote Proposal: Extend the 874 Time Traveller Line to Metrocentre
I've been looking at ways to strengthen the leisure network from Durham and wondered what people's thoughts would be on extending the current 874 beyond Beamish to provide a direct link to Chester-le-Street, Birtley and Metrocentre.
Proposed Route
874 Time Traveller Line
Durham Bus Station – Durham Rail Station – Bearpark – Ushaw – Witton Gilbert – Sacriston – Edmondsley – Grange Villa – Beamish Museum – Ouston – Barley Mow – Birtley – Metrocentre
Why?What about the X22?
- Creates a direct link from Durham to both Ushaw and Beamish Museum on the same service.
- Extends the route to another major leisure destination at Metrocentre, increasing its appeal to a wider range of passengers.
- Provides communities such as Bearpark, Witton Gilbert, Sacriston, Edmondsley and Grange Villa with a direct link to Metrocentre.
- Gives tourists staying in Durham an easy way to visit multiple attractions without needing to change buses.
- Creates a genuine cross-county leisure route linking heritage, culture, shopping and tourism.
With rising operating costs across the industry, there is a question over how sustainable it is to continue operating a standalone X22 solely between Chester-le-Street, Barley Mow, Birtley and Metrocentre, particularly if passenger numbers remain heavily concentrated on shopping trips.
Another factor is that the X22 no longer benefits from interworking with the X43 at Metrocentre. Instead, both services now require separate vehicle allocations, meaning two buses are tied up operating what are effectively two relatively niche routes. From an operational perspective, that can be difficult to justify when resources are under pressure and operators are looking to maximise vehicle utilisation.
By incorporating the X22 corridor into the 874, the same vehicle mileage could potentially serve a much wider market, attracting visitors to Ushaw and Beamish while also providing the Metrocentre connection. This could improve overall passenger loadings across the day rather than relying on a relatively short shopping route to generate demand on its own. It may also allow for more efficient vehicle deployment by combining leisure, tourism and shopping flows onto a single route.
(2 hours ago)Storx wrote From a Northstar point of view, it would be better to extend the X43 to Durham via the B6532, Sacriston, Durham Arnison and Durham Hospital imo.
Whether it would be sustainable who knows, but it's better than that long extended route around the world and does 2 of the places you've listed anyway. The links from South of Stanley have gone aswell and it opens new Stanley to Arnison links in the opposite direction which might pick a few people up which is a counter flow to the Metrocentre passengers.
(1 hour ago)TheClumsyPineapple wrote Arnison centre is good idea. But duplicating the 16 in an already busy corridor does not seem good. Something like once or twice a day (one in morning return in early afternoon) to lanchester may sound good?