(17 May 2015, 8:53 pm)MurdnunoC wrote Just to follow on from this - McCluskey's retort to Jim Murphy.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-hi...s-32771657
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015...-mccluskey
...and so all voices are heard.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics...abour.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...eyman.html
...One more thing.
Whenever I hear the name 'McCluskey', I immediately think of Grange Hill. Does anyone else?
I don't, but there again I never watched Grange Hill.
...and so Len's response points to the rules conference, and possible de-affiliation. It'll be interesting to see whether the Executive Council are in favour of the move, or just more feet stomping from McCluskey. I know the issue would have been spoken about at length, if some parties got their own way when a Unite and PCS merger was on the cards. I feel that the latter would rather walk over burning coals than have any sort of connection to the Labour Party.