(28 May 2015, 2:30 pm)Davie wrote I thought 4978-4981 were going on service 5 as Dan (I think) sated not so on back?
He did but this doesnt eliminate the possibility of 5229 taking 4979s role. If 4979 is there and for the reason stated, i dont know why 5229 wasnt chosen instead. It would keep the 5s allocation the same vehicle.