You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.

Skip to main content

Stagecoach North East: Latest News & Discussion - September 2015

Stagecoach North East: Latest News & Discussion - September 2015

RE: Stagecoach North East: Latest News & Discussion - September 2015
(13 Sep 2015, 3:02 pm)Kuyoyo wrote 36/37/38 is PVR 16 - a round cycle on each is 4 hours.

As for 27157-65 - I doubt they'll be used on 12 as effectively by using them on there you end up wig no spare examples to cover 36/37/38, 52/35, 58/35 and 59/61. Hence why I expect them to end up on either the 10/11 (allow for 4 spare examples) or the 39 (allowing for 5 spare examples Monday to Friday and 4 on a Saturday). That or they get allocated to those 12 and 39 workings that remain out on the late 12/39/10A/11A so the entire evening output is the more fuel-efficient vehicles.
My thought's:

1. Make the 35 an independent route again, got two spares right there - that route deoesn't need fancy wi-fi considering a larger amount of bus users are pensioners on that route, plus it's only full for the school run, other times it's relatively emptier than the other routes. This would leave for 3 spares. (if other 8 were put on 12)
2. Put five on the 13, every time I'm on it has decent loadings, it would mean all routes between Stockton - Middlesbro would be fully wi-fi and if their is a disaster one day, one bus could come off and be replaced at the depot, it would also allow them to stay out on evenings too.
3. Put 5 on the 10/11, with wi-fi, it could attract even more users on the number 10 and it would mean most of M'bro would have wi-fi buses.

I couldn't justify why the 39 would get wi-fi buses unless it would be extended to James Cook.

RE: Stagecoach North East: Latest News & Discussion - September 2015
RE: Stagecoach North East: Latest News & Discussion - September 2015