(12 Feb 2016, 7:31 pm)BusLoverMum wrote Aye. Just countering the indignation that ANE dared to withdraw the 64A from the area concerned without going through the process of registering the change beforehand. It was a rhetorical question

If the change is permanent, then aye - the issue needs dealt with down the official channels.
For something unplanned or done at immediate notice, then no.
The reporting process could take as long to complete as the temporary measure. RBeauracracy gone mad if it is going to be reported.

The 71 used to suffer issues with parked cars near Avenue Vivien, this often meant the service missing that part of the route when heading to Chester.. As it was temporary then no changes were made with VOSA.
When the 36 was introduced to replace the 71 they decided to omit the area completely.

I remember the 194 and 27 missing out certain areas way back when temporarily and then permanently, due to issues.
It didnt affect the areas beyond as an alternative route was identified