(30 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote I spoke to debra and she said safety is first and that people that take photos of people deliberately are classed as stalkersYou and Debra really dont have a clue...I would like to see that in Black and White
Taking a photo of somebody who happens to be on the bus your photographing is not a deliberate act of stalking, that is stupid, because in that case, we would all be classed as stalkers, including your good self if you take such a photo...
If you want to continue this conversation, feel more than free to PM me
(30 Jul 2016, 1:15 pm)Adrian wrote Can we end this here? This is on the verge of being ridiculous now, and is scaremongering.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with taking photos in public places, even if they include someone. You do not need their permission. Permission is only required when you're taking photos on private property, but even then, it would merely be classed a trespassing, which is a civil matter - not criminal.
Harassment does not come into it, unless you're deliberately following a particular person around, in order to log their movements or record what they're doing. This is a criminal matter.
This post of course does not constitute legal advice, and I'd always recommend that you spoke to a qualified legal professional, if you want your own guarantees.
Fair enough Adrian, best to leave it alone mate...Just think his claims are quite ridiculous
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk