(18 Nov 2018, 8:56 pm)NewcastleOne wrote I wouldn’t change anything just because the way it is have existed for a long time, apart from the 22 extension of course.
Just because something has existed for a long time, does that mean change is a bad idea? Not disagreeing, just a discussion point.
Possibly confusing to change service numbers which have existed for so long, but confusion would possibly be reduced in the long-term.
1 and 2 - Cobalt/Slatyford and Throckley (via Denton Burn), 10 and 11 North Kenton/West Denton (via Denton Burn), 12 to Wallsend and 12A to Walker, 39 or 40 to Wallsend and 39A or 40A to Walker, 62, 63 and 64 to Killingworth via Byker etc.
Sometimes changing the service numbers into groups of related numbers/services could help passengers. The 18 and 22 numbers seem quite far out to me, although if retaining service 22 as 22 I would change the 32/32A to 23/23A as like the 22 they serve Byker and Walkergate.