(16 Dec 2013, 4:08 pm)Michael wrote Oh no, that's not good, their changing them in January i think?
Yeah, apparently so.
That story was from mid-November, so the problems must have been going on for a while prior to that, for the paper to have been interested in writing an article on it.
Saw it a few weeks ago and just remembered about it.
Edit.
Just seen Dan's link from a week or two back.