You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.

Skip to main content

RE: Nexus

(24 Feb 2019, 12:52 pm)Andreos1 wrote When they're on, I am sure they could work on improving the W services in Whitley Bay and 333.

I would argue there's a bit of duplication within the W services and could look to improve revenues/margins (footfall) at the same time. 

W2 and W3 to merge (along with western elements of W1), with some slight variations to routes. 

W1 and 333 to merge (using the northern section of Broadway as the link) and 333 to serve Front Street in Tynemouth, before going back to its normal route, passing Linskill. 
On the Fish Quay, it will serve the ferry in both directions and omit Brewhouse Bank.


I know it would be difficult as it's two different operators and two different councils subsiding the services however the W2 would be better to merge with the 58. Then have a long extended bus route.


Cramlington -> New Hospital -> Seghill (Change From East Cramlington) -> Seaton Delaval -> New Hartley -> Seaton Sluice -> Whitley Bay Metro


This would create lots of new links such as:

  • Restore the half hourly service between Seghill and Cramlington.
  • New link from Seghill direct to hospital.
  • New links between New Hartley / Seaton Delaval Hall and Whitley Bay
  • New links between New Hartley / Seaton Delaval Hall / Seaton Sluice direct to the Metro for connections.

https://goo.gl/maps/km8fG7iHDyhSbcF56 - Something like that which would take an hour throughout with a PVR 2.


Then extend the 43 every hour to East Hartford like so to keep the Cramlington local links - https://goo.gl/maps/3Q9AyYXSoFqTxeAr7 and extend the 43 from Morpeth to Northgate Hospital doing the T1A route. (Maybe omit Beacon Hill as I'm not sure deckers can get around there) with an extra PVR 1 giving those a direct link to Newcastle without changing.

Makes better use of public funds and it's only an extra PVR of 1/2 bus. (Nothing doing T2 and T3) but creates more links and creates potentially some profit on the Seghill to Cramlington part which can be standing at times on the 57A and gives New Hartley their link back to Whitley, they've been moaning for awhile about losing the 12 - a few years ago.

Edit: Just noticed that post was February sorry but still true.


Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
Re: RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
Re: RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
Re: RE: Nexus
Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Nexus
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill
RE: Bus Services Bill