(29 Dec 2019, 2:03 pm)Dan wrote Don't forget that when a bus is running to a location which isn't the 'usual' terminus, i.e. only serving part of the route, then no via points are included on the destination display so that the terminus can be shown in a larger, bolder, font.
So in this instance of Durham, there will be a clear difference between the 'Durham then West Auckland' display and the 'Durham' only display.
You could argue that it's no more confusing than now, because the displays show "Bishop Auckland then Tindale Crescent" (not a requirement currently as it isn't a split route, but shown like that as Tindale Crescent isn't really a well-known place!)
Fully understand this one with wanting to differentiate between the long and short journeys so I have a degree in confidence that this one isn't going to need an in-depth reply, but merely as devil's advocate...
Why will Durham not fall under a 'regular/usual' terminus to get the new format yet places like Sunniside on the 6 and Quaking Houses on the M6 do?