(04 Jan 2014, 12:13 pm)CatsFast101 wrote Why are you shouting everyone down over this, I use the 20 about 10 times a week (Board Inn-Interchange, Houghton-Belmont, Durham-Sunderland etc.) I'd class my self as fairly regular passenger, you've admitted you don't use the 20 all to often so see it at park Lane a few times you happen to be passing but you now somewhat think that your opinion is superior over mine, Andreos1, and few others who have agreed with us. Why not take everyone's opinion on board instead of trying to prove everyone else wrong to prove you're right, we have no idea why the 35 would be put ahead of the 20 for upgrade; it could be argued the 35's have more potentional passengers due running two quite different routes (35/35A). However who's to say that the 20 and 35 may receive investment this year? We just don't know at this stage. I've given instance of the 20 loading at different points in the route however your Saturday observation at the termination point appears to be what you thinking we should al be be taken note of much more than my opinion.
Isn't this just a 'debate', as Andreos1 said? Nothing wrong with that, don't take it personally!
I have no view on this matter - I'm just going by the fact the Prince Bishops have not yet had an order alluded, but the Laser has... Of course there is plenty of scope for change, but if the Laser is down at this early stage for investment yet the Bishops isn't... That definitely tells me something.
So does the fact the PVR for the Bishops is still wholly Solar operated, and the fact it has only ever received re-brands.
I took an opinion from Andreos1 on board and said I agreed, but gave a reason for why I disagree when looking at the picture in full, and nowt was said!