You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.

Skip to main content

RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
(01 Aug 2021, 3:06 pm)L469 YVK wrote It's likely not 6071-83 that are the problem. It's 6043-48 that are likely the problem given their 5 year stint on the X9 & X10.

No doubt 6084-86 will replace 6045-47 with 6043-48 then probably either going on the 25 or perhaps the new 47/47A. Obviously GNE should still have 6001, 6049, 6050, 6099, 6160 and 6377 available as Riverside decker spares if needed.
6099 is at Washington as a high spec spare for the X1

Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses
RE: Tyne Valley Ten Buses