You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.

Skip to main content

Route Development | Network Expansion & New Services

Route Development | Network Expansion & New Services

RE: Route Development | Network Expansion & New Services
(13 Jan 2022, 10:36 pm)OrangeArrow49 wrote Has the 309/310 ever had decent passenger numbers? There isn't much in Whitley Bay, North Shields or Blyth and not even too much at the Cobalt (but a lot of employment there, pre-covid). Could anything be done to boost numbers? X39 full route? Maybe X36, X38 and X39 instead of 306, 308 and 309 for quicker journey times?

I'd say the 309/310/311 have decent passenger numbers on the common section of the route (i.e Battle Hill to Newcastle). After that it varies I'd say, they can be busy, but then other times dead.

(13 Jan 2022, 11:39 pm)OrangeArrow49 wrote Could the 1 terminate in Newcastle, and be curtailed at North Shields? Renumbered 301. Maybe it could be coordinated with the 22 between Newcastle and Wallsend?

I think the 1 is fine as it is. I don't see much value in coordinating it with the 22 as they take different routes for most of the way.

Curtailing it at North Shields isn't a good idea. Would leave areas without a route.

RE: Route Development | Network Expansion & New Services
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10
RE: Enviro 400MMC's for the X9 and X10