(16 Feb 2023, 10:02 pm)Adrian wrote I don't understand the argument you're making, if I'm honest! Shouldn't we treat public transport as infrastructure, just as we treat energy, water, healthcare, telecoms etc? We all rely on it, but seems to become a dirty word when we talk about spending public money on it.

I've outlined already the reasons why it's important that it exists.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

All I'm a asking for is an idea on how much you think is an acceptable level of subsidy per passenger per hour. A debate about how or who operates the buses isn't needed for that.