(13 Feb 2024, 8:01 pm)Adrian wrote It's a high-risk strategy imo. If the demand were there and it was zero or minimal risk, I'd imagine operators would be increasing the frequency anyway?

If it eventually becomes commercially viable, does the operator pay any of the previous subsidy back into the system to be reinvested?

The 56 one is the most baffling one to me, surely there's not people about who think well I'm not using the 56 it's only every 15 minutes. Oh hang on, it's now every 12 minutes now I'm definitely using that.

Do people really care about those 3 minutes? I can understand the argument on an hourly service which is unusable pretty much for most people though.