You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.

Skip to main content

RE: First "AI" Timetables
(19 Aug 2024, 10:04 pm)BusLoverMum wrote That makes the time.when the times for the 93/94 moved by 10 minutes per hour on a Saturday seem quite logical.

I can see what it's done. Frequency seems to be based on expected patronage at particular times of day but, as you said, fails to take availability and usage of drivers and vehicles into account.

To be fair, I don't think it actually does take account of patronage. Believe it's all purely based on timekeeping but it's just gone completely mad. There's problems all over the new York and Leeds timetables are the same, and in some cases there's just random hourly gaps in the middle of the day.

https://www.railforums.co.uk/forums/buses-coaches.166/ - There's a few threads in here, basically all the First ones and basically everyone has come to a conclusion that it's just bonkers and doesn't make sense in any form. Just AI going AWOL and no-one using common sense and thinking hmm maybe there's something wrong.

First "AI" Timetables
RE: First "AI" Timetables
RE: First "AI" Timetables
RE: First "AI" Timetables
RE: First "AI" Timetables
RE: First "AI" Timetables