You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.

Skip to main content

Service Numbers of the Past

RE: Service Numbers of the Past
(12 May 2026, 6:36 pm)cbma06 wrote Was it before the above comments, that the 192/193/194/195

192 Washington to Easington lane then Murton?

193 Washington to Easington Lane then Wheatley Hill or Thornley?

194 Washington to Easington Lane.

195 Washington to Hetton-Le-Hole via Bournmoor , in later in life was withdrawn when the X94 started up?, the evenings and Sunday journeys on the 195 were renumbered as 165 secured journeys operated by OK travel.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They all ran from Newcastle via  Washington

Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past
RE: Service Numbers of the Past