You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.

Skip to main content

Angel Network Bus Service Suggestions

RE: North East Region Bus Franchising Scheme
(20 Aug 2026, 8:24 pm)F114TML wrote Trouble is, most of those examples (particularly 22/301 and X12/X21) serve different markets that want the quickest route to the destination.
I'd agree with 6/X21 and 49/A/21

Aye no arguments, tbf was more thinking about consolidation rather than outright removing like having 23/60/61 every 7.5 minutes combined and the the X12/X21 every 15 minute combined (or close to) etc. Pointless them just bouncing all over like now especially the first corridor as the 23/61 just exist pretty much while the 60 is slammed.

(20 Aug 2026, 8:55 pm)solsburian wrote No thanks, for the X7 people in Seghill would not appreciate it getting any longer.

Tbf I think on of the X30 boards should go via Seghill and bring back the old X36 type route instead. Give you's a proper express then make the X7 actually useful for everyone else. It's a bit of a jack of all trades, master of none atm. Semi fast but the semi fast misses everything useful type thing.

Angel Network Bus Service Suggestions
RE: North East Region Bus Franchising Scheme
RE: North East Region Bus Franchising Scheme
RE: North East Region Bus Franchising Scheme
RE: North East Region Bus Franchising Scheme
RE: North East Region Bus Franchising Scheme
RE: North East Region Bus Franchising Scheme