I am not knocking any of the other suggestions, but adding to the list of theories.
It would be a shame to knock a post dead after a couple of posts.
My own theory is as follows (and like others, may be shot down as a load of tosh):
Traditionally, men designed, constructed, manufactured, assembled, used and serviced ships, cars, aircraft, buses, lorries etc.
The industry was a masculine domain and they were the days when allegedly, men were men.
An inanimate object, made from wood or metal being tended and cared for by a man, possibly needed to be categorised as you wouldn't have a man, tending and caring for another man...
Giving the mode of transport a 'female' name or referring to it as a 'she', could have made the caring and looking after it acceptable.
The crew of a ship going out to see, were proud of their vessel and wanted to show it off to their fellow sailors in the fleet and also the enemy.
It could be a load of tosh, but hey ho.
Why is it Enthusiasts Refer to Buses as Females?
Why is it Enthusiasts Refer to Buses as Females?
Why is it Enthusiasts Refer to Buses as Females?
•
by Malarkey
•
25 Apr 2014, 3:26 pm
RE: Why is it Enthusiasts Refer to Buses as Females?
•
by Adrian
•
25 Apr 2014, 4:04 pm
RE: Why is it Enthusiasts Refer to Buses as Females?
•
by MurdnunoC
•
25 Apr 2014, 4:05 pm
RE: Why is it Enthusiasts Refer to Buses as Females?
•
by Andreos1
•
25 Apr 2014, 5:22 pm