(23 Jul 2014, 2:20 pm)Robert wrote ah, found it. After reading my post to you, it did sound like i was having a go. I didnt intend it to sound like that.
Whey no, didn't sound like that at all.
After some of the names I have been called on here (that didn't bother me either), a post like yours is nowt - whether you meant it or not.
For the record, I have no idea whether it could operate commercially as it stands.
If a service was diverted to cover the route (say a 96) or a variation of the 1, then it could work.