(26 Sep 2014, 10:45 am)AdamY wrote It's also covered by the Data Protection Act (providing said footage is not being used by the police in a criminal investigation) although you might have to pay costs £10 to obtain the film.
It must also be supplied within 40 days of the request.
https://www.gov.uk/request-cctv-footage-of-yourself
Most CCTV on-board buses has other people in it; as such, CCTV footage is very rarely distributed to people who may request it.
Thought about whether to post this or not, but as, strictly speaking, it doesn't break the original rule I set out on the OP of this thread, I'll go for it...
I've said it before and I'll say it again, but the phrase, "I understand" or "We understand", so as to suggest the person posting information is in-the-know, greatly irritates me. It's not so much when that person is providing information ahead of it happening in reality, it's more so to do with the fact when the information has already been on the public domain and confirmed by an official source ahead of these posts being made...
The same people seem to say that they are in possession of 'lists' with information. Most of the time, these 'lists' are in the public domain as they have already been confirmed by an official source...
Can anyone tell me why people actually do this? If it really is so that they sound like they're well informed, or have good relationships with employees of the company concerned, they really need to have a word with themselves... Wake up and smell the coffee, sunshine, and jump off your high horse.