(11 Dec 2014, 7:49 pm)Andreos1 wrote Whilst working away, I generally tend up in prime UKIP/Tory territory. Nature of the job unfortunately.
In the bar/restaurant tonight, I have some old people talking about the price of wheat, tattoos and foodbanks.
Apparently, these single mothers should stop with the tattoos and put food first. If they didn't get the tattoos, they wouldn't need the foodbanks.
Moved to correct thread.
(11 Dec 2014, 7:55 pm)aureolin wrote Some people are so far from the real world it's unbelievable. You can tell there's a cost of living crisis when the only industry in boom is that of foodbanks.
I don't have tattoos - I don't really see the point of them, but I guess it would be interesting to plot the growth of foodbanks against sales of tattoos to see if there's any correlation between the two.
It would remind me of this graph, brought to prominence by The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
![[Image: 3946d1248317546-church-flying-spaghetti-...irates.png]](https://www.partyviberadio.com/forums/attachments/spirituality-morality-religion/3946d1248317546-church-flying-spaghetti-monster-pirates.png)
If Global Warming has risen due to the decline of pirates, then I guess it's plausible to theorise that there's some link between tattoos, single mothers and the rise of foodbanks.
You can prove anything to be true to graphs!
Those damn pastafarians.