You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.

Skip to main content

RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)
(05 Mar 2015, 6:29 pm)aureolin wrote I can understand capacity issues, and that was my first thought with regards to the ECML, but "refused the application for reasons that included protection of the revenues of Virgin Trains (the incumbent inter-city operator on the WCML)"

We're seriously knocking back an application for passenger choice, based on protecting profit of a private company?

ECML may be a different kettle of fish, as the new top speed, and the non-stop Newcastle to London services, may be exactly what the Tories are looking for in their infrastructure plans. High speed link, and someone else is wanting to pay for it!

Mine too. 

I found the WCML refusal rather alarming. If the government are protecting revenues to this extent then it might as well be nationalised.  

GNER (Alliance Rail)
RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)
RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)
RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)
RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)
RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)
RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)
RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)
RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)
RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)
RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)
RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)
RE: GNER (Alliance Rail)