(18 Sep 2015, 8:38 am)tyresmoke wrote 22475 on 12s, 24109 on 14/34

I am told 22475 was towed in tonight so that'll be the end of that one presumably.

Have seen 19646 sitting in the yard parked behind 22734 is it withdrawn. Regards Robin

(18 Sep 2015, 9:32 pm)Robin Tait wrote Have seen 19646 sitting in the yard parked behind 22734 is it withdrawn. Regards Robin

Reported yesterday... 
South Shields have finally received 19641 - 19646 for the increased X34 service. 

http://www.northeastbuses.co.uk/forum/sh...p?tid=1590&page=19

Kuyoyo further down reported that he understands 19647 is Walkergate bound.


Robin can u please read latest news or report latest news in the correct thread please.

Not having a go, just mentioning it

22018 on 12(/39)

(18 Sep 2015, 9:39 pm)Michael wrote Reported yesterday... 
South Shields have finally received 19641 - 19646 for the increased X34 service. 

http://www.northeastbuses.co.uk/forum/sh...p?tid=1590&page=19

Kuyoyo further down reported that he understands 19647 is Walkergate bound.


Robin can u please read latest news or report latest news in the correct thread please.

Not having a go, just mentioning it

*like*

22073 on 62/63

27176 (Zone) on 10A etc yesterday.

22035 on 62/63

Awful allocating at Stockton today, Dots 27241 on 14/34, 27244 on 10/11 and 27251 also in Middlesbrough (maybe on 12s?)
Meanwhile unbranded 27239 is on 59/61?!

(21 Sep 2015, 2:48 pm)tyresmoke wrote Awful allocating at Stockton today, Dots 27241 on 14/34, 27244 on 10/11 and 27251 also in Middlesbrough (maybe on 12s?)
Meanwhile unbranded 27239 is on 59/61?!

27251 is on 10/11 now with 27241 (27244 is the one on 14/34), 251 replaced 17028 at 1404 having been spare this mornng. Considering there's only 14 branded examples for 17 workings, 27238/9'a appearance on 59/61 or 27240's on 52/35 isn't odd - 24113 and 22065/6 on 59/61 and 22018/9/20 on 58/35 on the other hand.....

I through the dot braning of the stagecoach on teesside new buses post to be for service 52/58/61/35 but why was it on the 39 service when I thought it was for the Stockton area

(21 Sep 2015, 2:52 pm)Kuyoyo wrote 27251 is on 10/11 now with 27241 (27244 is the one on 14/34), 251 replaced 17028 at 1404 having been spare this mornng. Considering there's only 14 branded examples for 17 workings, 27238/9'a appearance on 59/61 or 27240's on 52/35 isn't odd - 24113 and 22065/6 on 59/61 and 22018/9/20 on 58/35 on the other hand.....

It is when there's 3 branded examples elsewhere on services they shouldn't be on.

(21 Sep 2015, 2:52 pm)Kuyoyo wrote 27251 is on 10/11 now with 27241 (27244 is the one on 14/34), 251 replaced 17028 at 1404 having been spare this mornng. Considering there's only 14 branded examples for 17 workings, 27238/9'a appearance on 59/61 or 27240's on 52/35 isn't odd - 24113 and 22065/6 on 59/61 and 22018/9/20 on 58/35 on the other hand.....

(21 Sep 2015, 3:07 pm)tyresmoke wrote It is when there's 3 branded examples elsewhere on services they shouldn't be on.

Please read what I've highlighted in bold - 27238-40 should all still be on 35/52/58/59/61 to make up the PVR. 27241/4/51/2 (27252 is on the 36/37 which works the 364 on a morning) should all be on there instead of 22018/9/20/65/6/671 (22671 is now on 52/35 having replaced 17025) and 24113 should be on 10/11 or 14/34 (and an unbranded 64-reg should be on 36/37)

(21 Sep 2015, 3:07 pm)tyresmoke wrote It is when there's 3 branded examples elsewhere on services they shouldn't be on.

*like*

Dots today on the 10, 11. 14, 34, 36 and 37!

And a Zone on the 12!

You just dont get it do you Tony The dots should be on the dots routes End of This is why the branding is a total waste of time and money

(21 Sep 2015, 4:34 pm)alanf wrote You just dont get it do you Tony The dots should be on the dots routes End of This is why the branding is a total waste of time and money

And the fact that there are only 14 branded vehicles to cover a PVR of 17...

(21 Sep 2015, 4:13 pm)Cock Robin wrote *like*

Can we avoid these pointless *like* posts, please?

I appreciate you may have used the like system when it was in operation, but it was removed because it was abused by a few members. Making these posts to express the fact you 'like' something that has been said isn't constructive in the slightest, and comes across as a personal vendetta against Kuyoyo. Feel free to debate something that he has said, but these sly digs at him really have to stop, and I think the forum's moderation team have overlooked this for long enough.

Please associate yourself with the forum rules found on the link below, and I have copied across the most important rule on that page below:
http://www.northeastbuses.co.uk/forum/mi...ction=help&hid=8

Every member deserves to be treated with respect. Posts which are welcoming create a friendly environment which all members will feel comfortable in. Do not post material which in any way discriminates against, or provokes, any person or group of persons. Some users wish to remain anonymous; do not post information that may lead to the personal details of any individual being identified without their permission, unless already publicly available. Targeting others - directly or indirectly - will not be tolerated.

(21 Sep 2015, 2:57 pm)glen wrote I through the dot braning of the stagecoach on teesside new buses post to be for service 52/58/61/35 but why was it on the 39 service when I thought it was for the Stockton area

Its not even for the 35 but because of interworking they turn up on it Dare i say it was badly thought out

This whole day has been a mess!

If you hadn't taken away the 'like' feature we wouldn't have to make 'pointless' posts would we. Seems to work well enough on Facebook.

(21 Sep 2015, 4:41 pm)S813 FVK wrote And the fact that there are only 14 branded vehicles to cover a PVR of 17...

Even dafter then that the ones that actually ARE branded aren't on there!

(21 Sep 2015, 5:27 pm)Cock Robin wrote If you hadn't taken away the 'like' feature we wouldn't have to make 'pointless' posts would we. Seems to work well enough on Facebook.

Wasn't me who took it away, but the decision was made because too many people were making snide comments against each other, seemingly in an attempt to gain likes... Most of these comments have now stopped, and the sooner your digs at Kuyoyo stop, the better.

So its fine for him to have a dig at anyone he likes is it, but as soon as anyone gives him it back you have to step in to fight his battles? Well you won't be seeing me on here again. That'll no doubt please him. Keep the coast clear - he can post all the assumptions he likes and no-one need correct him.

(21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm)Cock Robin wrote So its fine for him to have a dig at anyone he likes is it, but as soon as anyone gives him it back you have to step in to fight his battles? Well you won't be seeing me on here again. That'll no doubt please him. Keep the coast clear - he can post all the assumptions he likes and no-one need corect him.

You seem to be of the opinion that I'm picking sides, when I'm really not...

I'm stepping in as a moderator to stop the constant bitching and bickering on this forum. I'm sick and tired of giving up my evenings to read it, and refuse for it to continue. As posted on the Go North East Latest thread earlier, this forum is going downhill, and it's thanks to childish and petty arguments.

Don't care who has posted it - it won't be tolerated any more.

(21 Sep 2015, 5:49 pm)Dan wrote You seem to be of the opinion that I'm picking sides, when I'm really not...

I'm stepping in as a moderator to stop the constant bitching and bickering on this forum. I'm sick and tired of giving up my evenings to read it, and refuse for it to continue. As posted on the Go North East Latest thread earlier, this forum is going downhill, and it's thanks to childish and petty arguments.

Don't care who has posted it - it won't be tolerated any more.

Your not the only mod on here, not sure why you should give up your evenings to do it...

I don't want to say everything what i think of this forum atm but i'm close to quitting because i'm sick of it.

17027 on 58
17032 on 13

22018/9 on 58/35

(24 Sep 2015, 8:18 am)Kuyoyo wrote 22018/9 on 58/35

17027 also on the 58/35 (27241 makes up the foursome)
17029/32 on 13 in reverse order (17032 is the working half an hour in front of 17029)