Direct Rail Services (DRS) set to carry passengers to alleviate network burden.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/13bc45b8-9c00-...z3OzIMnvTD
(Please note, you have to answer a question to view this article)
Trains
Trains
RE: Trains
If you google it, you can view it directly without having to register etc.
Quite ironic, that the DfT are funding this, paying Northern to hire in a publically owned operator.
They're already contracted to run stuff for Greater Anglia too.
Another irony is, that the train manufacturing sites, which built the stock DRS are using, were all closed off following privatisation and the end of BR.
Imagine the benefits those train manufacturers could bring to the UK?
Quite ironic, that the DfT are funding this, paying Northern to hire in a publically owned operator.
They're already contracted to run stuff for Greater Anglia too.
Another irony is, that the train manufacturing sites, which built the stock DRS are using, were all closed off following privatisation and the end of BR.
Imagine the benefits those train manufacturers could bring to the UK?
'Illegitimis non carborundum'
RE: Trains
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/r...ktank.html
So the taxpayer pays for the removal of the track and infrastructure, covers the cost of the tarmac and the private sector (once 'liberalised'), reaps the benefits and profits?
Didn't eezypeazy come out with an idea like this once?
So the taxpayer pays for the removal of the track and infrastructure, covers the cost of the tarmac and the private sector (once 'liberalised'), reaps the benefits and profits?
Didn't eezypeazy come out with an idea like this once?
'Illegitimis non carborundum'
RE: Trains
(03 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm)Andreos1 wrote http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/r...ktank.htmlI suggested that I would have been in favour of the conversion of the Tyne and Metro system into a dedicated busway. The aged stock on the Tyne and Wear Metro network has seemingly proven unreliable as of late - if newer stock could be deployed on a new busway with new technology such as free Wi-Fi and power sockets, I think it would work a treat.
So the taxpayer pays for the removal of the track and infrastructure, covers the cost of the tarmac and the private sector (once 'liberalised'), reaps the benefits and profits?
Didn't eezypeazy come out with an idea like this once?
RE: Trains
(03 Feb 2015, 12:49 pm)Dan wrote I suggested that I would have been in favour of the conversion of the Tyne and Metro system into a dedicated busway. The aged stock on the Tyne and Wear Metro network has seemingly proven unreliable as of late - if newer stock could be deployed on a new busway with new technology such as free Wi-Fi and power sockets, I think it would work a treat.
Arriva Sapphire, Stagecoach Gold, Go North East ????, it'll be bus wars again!
RE: Trains
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-31113368
Quite an interesting article, exploring issues around the coast lines at Dawlish, South Wales and around the cumbrian coast.
Quite an interesting article, exploring issues around the coast lines at Dawlish, South Wales and around the cumbrian coast.
'Illegitimis non carborundum'
RE: Trains
Something which I would really want to do:
http://www.swisstravelsystem.com/en/high...rland.html
They all look stunning. and I'd imagine there would be some exceptional photograph opportunities. Not sure when I could do it, but hopefully soon
http://www.swisstravelsystem.com/en/high...rland.html
They all look stunning. and I'd imagine there would be some exceptional photograph opportunities. Not sure when I could do it, but hopefully soon
RE: Trains
(16 Feb 2015, 10:12 pm)Tom wrote Something which I would really want to do:Done in the Norway in a Nutshell, which is recommended.
http://www.swisstravelsystem.com/en/high...rland.html
They all look stunning. and I'd imagine there would be some exceptional photograph opportunities. Not sure when I could do it, but hopefully soon
'Illegitimis non carborundum'
RE: Trains
(08 Aug 2015, 6:55 am)danpick wrote The Royal train is going north today it arrives at Newcastle at around 1 and will wait 20 minutes it will also wait 30 minutes at Morpeth its on Real Time Trains as 168KI think this is a charter, the stock is Chocolate and Cream w sleepers on rear loco reported as 68008
RE: Trains
RE: Trains
68008 was the locomotive, it missed out North Morpeth loop making it 32E.
RE: Trains
RE: Trains
[attachment=7025
RE: Trains
(09 Aug 2015, 11:48 am)MurdnunoC wrote Some sort of Railtour has just passed Metrocentre hauled by locos.
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/U5...9/advanced
RE: Trains
Yesterday that wasn't the Royal Train.
There is never any paths on Realtime Trains for it due to it being a sensitive move. However it does show on the Realtime Maps you can get access to (such as Railcam).
That charter today was the Noah's Arc from Glasgow to Crewe, a charity charter formed from a GBRf staff charter yesterday.
There is never any paths on Realtime Trains for it due to it being a sensitive move. However it does show on the Realtime Maps you can get access to (such as Railcam).
That charter today was the Noah's Arc from Glasgow to Crewe, a charity charter formed from a GBRf staff charter yesterday.
RE: Trains
(09 Aug 2015, 3:01 pm)northern156 wrote Yesterday that wasn't the Royal Train.
There is never any paths on Realtime Trains for it due to it being a sensitive move. However it does show on the Realtime Maps you can get access to (such as Railcam).
That charter today was the Noah's Arc from Glasgow to Crewe, a charity charter formed from a GBRf staff charter yesterday.
We found out that whoever told Lee was bullshitting.
Against the Anti-Lee Club.
RE: Trains
(09 Aug 2015, 3:01 pm)northern156 wrote Yesterday that wasn't the Royal Train.
There is never any paths on Realtime Trains for it due to it being a sensitive move. However it does show on the Realtime Maps you can get access to (such as Railcam).
That charter today was the Noah's Arc from Glasgow to Crewe, a charity charter formed from a GBRf staff charter yesterday.
I gathered it wouldn't be the Royal Train, mainly due to the fact RailUKForums wasn't in meltdown
Why does moves like the Royal Train not get shown on websites such as RTT etc? Does it not show up at all, even as a STP or VSTP?
RE: Trains
(09 Aug 2015, 3:37 pm)GX03 SVC wrote I gathered it wouldn't be the Royal Train, mainly due to the fact RailUKForums wasn't in meltdown
Why does moves like the Royal Train not get shown on websites such as RTT etc? Does it not show up at all, even as a STP or VSTP?
I hadn't realised that they weren't, until Sean had said, but it does make sense. Putting Royal movements on an open data service would breach about every security rule in the book.
(09 Aug 2015, 3:42 pm)danpick wrote And as it was Bullshit Andrew said if it didn't come he owed me, Lee and Davie all £100.
I think I've got more chance of getting Michelle Keegan round my place tonight, than you have of seeing that £100.
Forum Moderator | Find NEB on facebook