(09 Aug 2022, 8:50 am)Aaron21 wrote If that's the case. Then why can't the 310 serve Hadrian Park if a lot of people use it. And if that's the case then I'd love to know why it never carry anyone when I see it.Putting the 309 through Hadrian Park would be commercial suicide as the "it gans doooon the motaaaway" brigade would soon be all over it (even though the Coast Road is NOT a motorway).
Main reasons as you can get the 335/41/41A between Hadrian Park & Station Road (335) & Coast Road (41/41A). But for Newcastle you can get the 310 which would be a lot easier to extend into Hadrian Park than having the 311 which is just the 310 without the Hadrian Park. Or what about putting the 309 & 310 into Hadrian Park. Wouldn't that make more sense than having a route that is just a copy of another route
310 likewise, yes totally fine going through Hadrian Park during the evening when roads are quiet. However it would not make much sense at all during the day as the PVR would only reduce by 2x vehicles (both 309 & 310 running every 20 mins each) and the benefits if any whatsoever would be very small going from a 6-7 minute frequency to a 10 minute frequency.
Even if the Coast Road was 'cleaned up' with the 306, 308, 309 and 310 all running every 20 mins each creating a combined frequency on common sections up to every 5 mins, GNE in that case would be better abandoning the Hadrian Park to Newcastle link and Stagecoach stepping in with a 22A (22 every 20 mins to Cobalt and 22A every 20 mins to Hadrian Park).