(Yesterday, 10:45 am)Michael wrote I need to stop working stuff out haha, I forgot about all the interworking's too - the 24/25/26/35 and 36 all interworking is going to be a nightmare, bet we see the loads of cancelations - what about the 9, as that currently interworks with the current 5, 24 and 26.
Thanks Peter, it was just a quick guess tbh, the current design on the new timetables aren't very good either.
Least the Versa will finally go....
Yeah it's a weird interworking pattern as well, starting from Sunderland:
-7 buses do a 24 to South Shields, a 26 to Lukes Lane and back, a 24 to Sunderland, then a 36 to Lukes Lane and back
-3 buses do a 24 to South Shields, a 25 to Jarrow, a 35 to Sunderland
-3 buses do a 35 to Jarrow, a 25 to South Shields, a 24 to Sunderland
-3 buses do the other two 24 journeys per hour to South Shields and back only
The 9 doesn't currently interwork with that circuit and will seemingly continue standalone with long layovers (pretty sure that was done on purpose due to potential roadwork delays?)
(Yesterday, 11:06 am)Storx wrote I don't know but allocation wise I'd personally say
61/62/62A: Streetlite
33/63: Solo SR
With the Solo's moving to see off some of the non standard stuff ie. 638, 721 and 723 in particular since none got repainted into the new Tynedale Links livery or are still running around in GNW livery and I don't believe the seatbelts are needed nowadays.
Yeah could see that happening as well tbf, there again if a couple Streetlites were freed up to go to Washington, they could move a couple Solo's on from there as they currently have 10 plus the Sprinter for a PVR of just 8. Agreed tho, would be good to see the back of 638, 709, 721 and 723 - with them tho it might be that they're holding out to see what happens with the 79 and 82 contracts - it'll be either them or Versa's that go for sure