RE: Electric Buses/new orders
6810 is tracking as 6051 Crusader today
Wistfully stuck in the 90s
Skip to main content
(30 Jan 2026, 4:46 pm)Malarkey wrote 6820/6821 have both entered service on the 58 today.
6820 - https://www.flickr.com/photos/adammalark...ateposted/
6821 - https://www.flickr.com/photos/adammalark...ateposted/
(30 Jan 2026, 7:00 pm)Ian1254 wrote 6820 died on the bank on split crow road about 1:30
(30 Jan 2026, 8:05 pm)Malarkey wrote 6823 looks to also potentially entered service, currently tracking on Bustimes.org on the 21 to CLS.
https://bustimes.org/services/21-gateshe...n-birt#map
No other Electroliners are out on the 21/58's this evening.
(30 Jan 2026, 7:10 pm)L469 YVK wrote I've seen there's been a few wobblers with the new Ultroliners (both diesel / ev).
At least not as bad as when 6071-83 got pulled off the road on launch day back in 2013, and a mad scramble to get the Mercs intended for the 27 from Sunderland Road back to Winlaton / Hexham.
(30 Jan 2026, 9:54 pm)Arriva7446 wrote What was that all about? I wasn't into buses then so have never heard about this?
(01 Feb 2026, 9:41 pm)Ambassador wrote Do the electrics have the range to cover from that first departure at 4am ex Durham to the last one at 23.46 ex Newcastle?
(01 Feb 2026, 9:48 pm)NL62WVW wrote No, the ones that have been going out first thing in the morning are normally on 15-20% by 4pm.
(01 Feb 2026, 9:41 pm)Ambassador wrote Do the electrics have the range to cover from that first departure at 4am ex Durham to the last one at 23.46 ex Newcastle?
(02 Feb 2026, 12:00 am)GetMalarkey wrote Must be an Efficiency issue there then as that figure is lower than what Wrightbus stating there data often shows a figure of around 30% at the point of returning to the depot on 2nd Gen Models which built from 2025 onwards.
Sounds to me like the following needs to be done.
A.) Additional Buses are required to cover PVR as there is not enough.
B.) Re-charging points are required across the route to boost battery during the day.
C.) Re-work of "Service Scheduling" i.e. interworking of CLS Shorts/Durham Longs and finding alternative solutions to combat issues being faced currently thus to ensure EV's are out in service for the full day from first service to last service.
Can't foresee the above being an issue with the 58's given the operational milage will be significantly less than the 21's.
One thing I would potentially look at is cutting the Brandon runs to terminate at Durham and then have alternative service cover the Durham-Brandon section which would save 7 miles of battery milage, iirc from the current scheduling they do 3 Newcastle - Brandon returns per day which would save 21 miles per bus used which in turn would see the efficiency percentage increase as the Buses would have more battery to enable them to stay in service longer per day.
(02 Feb 2026, 12:00 am)Malarkey wrote Must be an Efficiency issue there then as that figure is lower than what Wrightbus stating there data often shows a figure of around 30% at the point of returning to the depot on 2nd Gen Models which built from 2025 onwards.
Sounds to me like the following needs to be done.
A.) Additional Buses are required to cover PVR as there is not enough.
B.) Re-charging points are required across the route to boost battery during the day.
C.) Re-work of "Service Scheduling" i.e. interworking of CLS Shorts/Durham Longs and finding alternative solutions to combat issues being faced currently thus to ensure EV's are out in service for the full day from first service to last service.
Can't foresee the above being an issue with the 58's given the operational milage will be significantly less than the 21's.
One thing I would potentially look at is cutting the Brandon runs to terminate at Durham and then have alternative service cover the Durham-Brandon section which would save 7 miles of battery milage, iirc from the current scheduling they do 3 Newcastle - Brandon returns per day which would save 21 miles per bus used which in turn would see the efficiency percentage increase as the Buses would have more battery to enable them to stay in service longer per day.
(02 Feb 2026, 7:29 am)NL62WVW wrote Coincidentally I've got the bus that does the 0422 out of Durham on my shift later on this afternoon so will be able to see what charge is left in it.
(02 Feb 2026, 8:13 pm)NL62WVW wrote To follow this up,
Took 6812 with 30% charge remaining to Brandon at 1520, arrived back at Gateshead with 11% where it was parked up.
Given 6820 to complete the board back to Chester which doesn't even have 500miles on it and the heating is broken already.
(02 Feb 2026, 10:39 pm)Storx wrote Does anyone know what batteries these are fitted with as if they have the 275 mile battery I'm not totally conviced this is fixable at all.
The example above, is giving a total of around 200 mile a day, in real world terms, which isn't totally unrealistic on cold days (it's generally reported as 30% less on EV Cars) and no-one is getting the top range regardless unless you run it to empty, everyone drives perfectly and are running at city speeds which isn't the 21.
https://bustimes.org/vehicles/gnel-6152?date=2026-02-02 - Picking a board like that, which is one of the shorter ones, you're looking at round 200 miles (using 10 miles for a CLS run, 15 miles for a Durham and 20 miles for Brandon).
Who knows, but I wouldn't be surprised if someone has made a huge cock up here.
---
For a side note the longest 63 board at Redcar is 195 mile roughly, the same 63 which uses single deckers which have a longer range, and Arriva ditched due to range issues...
(02 Feb 2026, 10:55 pm)PH - BQA wrote Agreed. I'd find it more concerning that this is how they are performing straight out of the gate, with zero degradation.
Have any of them actually completed a full duty yet on anything beyond a late runout?
Are the Arriva 43/44/45 boards more realistic? From what I've heard the BYD has been getting some decent numbers when on driver training.