Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Started something here haven't I? The only thing that's interesting me now is the timetable / runs this Solo does?
(04 May 2014, 8:19 pm)robisdave15 wrote [ -> ]Started something here haven't I? The only thing that's interesting me now is the timetable / runs this Solo does?
http://www.dalesbus.org, click the Summer Buses section then 'Northern Dalesman'
As Kuyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyo has stated, it's 4 or 5 separate routes, split exactly to avoid the need for tachographs and EU driving hours, much like the 4/X4 and X1/X2 (for example) are. It's operated by a Solo, generally a newer one!
The X59 is a once a day run on a Monday - Friday, completely separate nothing to do with Dalesbus. Indeed that one is split to avoid tachos too, running as service 59 from/to Leyburn-Askrigg. I believe it is funded by NYCC, and is operated by Solos too, running on/off different 14 boards.
(04 May 2014, 8:04 pm)buznut wrote [ -> ]Ok then,what are the tachograph solos for...I don't think they need them for town services!Are they use on the 21s to Peterlee.
If the tachographs are not kept within calibration every few years, they cannot be used for EU work anyway. Its very likely they are ornamental now and a throwback of potential flexibility when new.
Started a bit of a debate there didn't I? All this money spent on unnecessary tachos when all that was really needed was to look at the legislation closely and decide which routes could operate using split service numbers and domestic hours. I know our x93 can't be split, how many others are they?
**Would anyone here care to explain just why the idiots at Redcar chose to allocate Scania Ommicity to the 0925 X93 journey ex Middlesbrough? It was packed and standing when it arrived in Guisborough and left myself and others waiting! All this talk about high management and what have you? As I see it it's just bull****! They'll never change.
(05 May 2014, 8:43 am)robisdave15 wrote [ -> ]Started a bit of a debate there didn't I? All this money spent on unnecessary tachos when all that was really needed was to look at the legislation closely and decide which routes could operate using split service numbers and domestic hours. I know our x93 can't be split, how many others are they?
For years, the 685 Newcastle-Carlisle service was run by Arriva under tachographs, then Stagecoach split their 685 route at Brampton and ran without.
Now, Arriva have split the route (at Haydon Bridge) and also run without tachos.
Whilst there is obviously a loophole (and, it can be argued that the differentiation between services requiring tachographs and those not is debatable), I cannot help feeling that changing the route number of a service that is run as a through route with the vehicle (and driver) continuing unbroken (ie no rest break during the journey) is against the spirit of the regulations and, maybe, even, the letter (regular service on route exceeding 50km).
I realise that there is a 5½ hour limit with a break of at least 30 minutes that is, presumably, not infringed, although there is the alternative option of within any period of 8 ½ hours in the working day, total breaks amounting to at least 45 minutes, but these are independent of whether a tachograph is required or not.
It might have been an inconvenience to have to fit and use tachographs, but the regulations are there for a purpose - or am I being naive?
If a route offers through-ticketing and there is no change of vehicle or driver, then changing the route number/destination board is purely cosmetic is it not?
(04 May 2014, 8:01 pm)robisdave15 wrote [ -> ]Going to have a look at the timetable. A shame that our National Park people aren't as pro-active as those from the Yorkshire Dales? Am sure the Moorsbus will be missed.
Totally agree. At least East Yorkshire are making an effort and providing some sort of commercial replacement, unlike Arriva, despite the healthy loadings last year.
(04 May 2014, 7:59 pm)JoshP wrote [ -> ]Why on earth would Solo's need a tachograph? There's no route long enough that a Solo is used on that requires a tachograph (well not in Darlington or Durham anyways)
Maybe for private hire?
(05 May 2014, 9:13 am)robisdave15 wrote [ -> ]**Would anyone here care to explain just why the idiots at Redcar chose to allocate Scania Ommicity to the 0925 X93 journey ex Middlesbrough? It was packed and standing when it arrived in Guisborough and left myself and others waiting! All this talk about high management and what have you? As I see it it's just bull****! They'll never change.
Absolutely ridiculous. on a bank holiday weekend. Of course, prior to last year there was always an enhanced service operating at this time of year. I would write to the media. As I've said plenty of times, it is high time they had competition on this route.
(05 May 2014, 11:06 am)Roland Pratt wrote [ -> ]Totally agree. At least East Yorkshire are making an effort and providing some sort of commercial replacement, unlike Arriva, despite the healthy loadings last year.
And also unlike many other operators who were involved, Transdev for example. I'm intrigued to see whether East Yorkshire can actually make it pay.
There's no excuse for 4651 being on the X93 at that time though... They know the 0925 from Middlesbrough is going to be busy, so a single deck on that diagram (if they have to put a single deck on anywhere!) is less than ideal.
I'm sorry Scott but that response is simply not good enough. They pulled this stroke last year running a MPD on a similar trip; there is absolutely no excuse they can offer, it's just Redcars way of doing things and nothing is going to change, I was prepared to give them a chance this season but not anymore, my spies will be out and about feeding back to me and as Roland says, we'll take it to the media, for any notice they'll take. This is Arriva and no one cares!
As for the comments about Transdev and others operating services to help replace some of the Moorsbus journeys we are really wasting our breath as if it doesn't make money then Arriva simply aren't interested, same as the 93's.
(05 May 2014, 12:10 pm)robisdave15 wrote [ -> ]As for the comments about Transdev and others operating services to help replace some of the Moorsbus journeys we are really wasting our breath as if it doesn't make money then Arriva simply aren't interested, same as the 93's.
No business will operate something that doesn't make money. Hence nobody operating into the National Park ... I am interested to see whether East Yorkshire can make theirs pay, operating it as a tourist service and therefore ENCTS passes aren't valid, albeit with a reduced concessionary fare. They haven't announced the times or fares yet but the outbound timings appear to be good for onward connections to Whitby or Helmsley.
If I had to bet now, I would say it won't run in 2015 but we'll see!
You can't defend 4651 on X93, no matter what I say! It has been reported to higher up though!
(05 May 2014, 12:20 pm)tyresmoke wrote [ -> ]operating it as a tourist service and therefore ENCTS passes aren't valid, albeit with a reduced concessionary fare.
AD122 accepted pensioner passes last year - I don't know about this year.
Sorry Scott, it's not you I'm having a go at but unfortunately you seem to be the only serious link there is to Arriva that there is? It's no use using CS because we know from experience that this is about as much use as an ash tray on a motorbike! Writing direct to area management, in my eyes, seems to offer little and I don't really want a free ticket by way of an apology! Thankfully I don't need or wish to
travel on the 93 regularly which in one respect is s good thing but in another, not, because I can't keep an eye on them! On behalf of the 10 or so people that were waiting in Guisborough this morning and had their days spoiled I would like to complain, but who to that would matter? Personally I would like to here Redcars reasoning for allocating 4655 ? But they haven't got one, have they?
(05 May 2014, 12:51 pm)robisdave15 wrote [ -> ]Sorry Scott, it's not you I'm having a go at but unfortunately you seem to be the only serious link there is to Arriva that there is? It's no use using CS because we know from experience that this is about as much use as an ash tray on a motorbike! Writing direct to area management, in my eyes, seems to offer little and I don't really want a free ticket by way of an apology! Thankfully I don't need or wish to
travel on the 93 regularly which in one respect is s good thing but in another, not, because I can't keep an eye on them! On behalf of the 10 or so people that were waiting in Guisborough this morning and had their days spoiled I would like to complain, but who to that would matter? Personally I would like to here Redcars reasoning for allocating 4655 ? But they haven't got one, have they?
But this is an enthusiast forum. What do you expect to achieve by constantly complaining about it on here?
(05 May 2014, 12:58 pm)aureolin wrote [ -> ]But this is an enthusiast forum. What do you expect to achieve by constantly complaining about it on here?
About as much as you can expect to achieve by e-mailing the company, it seems...
Still waiting for the reply to my e-mail, about the same service! Half tempted to write to Bus Users UK...
Don't worry I had a compliment put in by someone who I know from school and still waiting to hear anything about that. This would be about 2 months ago...
(05 May 2014, 1:03 pm)tyresmoke wrote [ -> ]Don't worry I had a compliment put in by someone who I know from school and still waiting to hear anything about that. This would be about 2 months ago...
Out of interest, what's the usual procedure when Customer Services receive a good word about a driver (assuming it's universal across all companies - or at least similar)?
In the same e-mail I mentioned above, I did compliment a driver or two I had on the same day. When writing to bus companies, I do try and slot in a good experience I've had during the day so it's not all negative.
(05 May 2014, 12:59 pm)Dan wrote [ -> ]About as much as you can expect to achieve by e-mailing the company, it seems...
Still waiting for the reply to my e-mail, about the same service! Half tempted to write to Bus Users UK...
Good luck with Bus Users UK. They're about as useful as a broken leg, and they make Arriva's care-free customer service, and apathetic apologies look decent.
We know it's an enthusiasts forum and all that but then we know just how effective e-mailing Arriva is? I have been vorcifarus I know and this not the place; I should have PM'd Scott direct. But then I was annoyed at having my day spoilt and sometimes you find out things by speaking out and doing things this way? There Is a comment made about going to a higher authority than Arriva? Never had that experience.** Just update my post here based on what Auorelin had to say? That's what I thought but didn't want to fuel the fire!
(05 May 2014, 1:12 pm)robisdave15 wrote [ -> ]We know it's an enthusiasts forum and all that but then we know just how effective e-mailing Arriva is? I have been vorcifarus I know and this not the place; I should have PM'd Scott direct. But then I was annoyed at having my day spoilt and sometimes you find out things by speaking out and doing things this way? There Is a comment made about going to a higher authority than Arriva? Never had that experience.
I think I've suggested before, but why don't you pursue this through your councillors or MP? Election season (at least locally) is upon us, so they'll be more inclined to do something for you. You read stories in the papers every now and again about bus links improved or saved, with councillors or MPs getting the usual photo shoot in the process. Got to be at least worth a try for you?
Right folks, got the X93 stuff out of my skin and a bit apology to anyone not happy with my doing it this way. This though is just a bit of a defence to Arriva and indeed the other operators with regard to the Moorsbus. Much of the blame for the demise of this would in fact appear to cone from the North York Moors
National Park people and the communities/people therein? Operators will, as Scott says, provide a commercially based service if it makes money and provide vehicles if asked on tender/contract basis. Few will gamble unless they have an idea that said gamble is going to work/pay; I feel that's the basis behind what East Yorkshire/Transdev are doing? Essentially we lost the Moorsbus on the
basis that it didn't pay and with the NYMNP
short of cash it was axed, no one bothered to
see if any other bodies/organisations/funding
providers would come on board? My reasoning is based on what I know from the Yorkshire Dales NP and the stuff I read following my ask about the Dalesbus? It seems across there there is a collective of funding providers etc that have come together to provide a quite vibrant and am sure,sustainable network of services across the Park. Here in Guisborough, on the edge of the National Park we can't get anywhere on a Sunday/Bank Holiday using public transport !
Do any of the Sapphire pulsars have the fleetnumber on the outside just been looking through pictures of 1518 from yesterday and can't see it?
(05 May 2014, 2:39 pm)mb134 wrote [ -> ]Do any of the Sapphire pulsars have the fleetnumber on the outside just been looking through pictures of 1518 from yesterday and can't see it?
Yes, they have them on the side but you can barely read them as its the same colour as the paintwork. Also has the fleet number on the rear.
(05 May 2014, 2:45 pm)Jimmi wrote [ -> ]Yes, they have them on the side but you can barely read them as its the same colour as the paintwork. Also has the fleet number on the rear.
Cheers
just thought it was a bit strange
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17