(15 Sep 2023, 9:50 am)xpm wrote Because management love their employees infighting amongst themselves so it deflects some of the attention from the company. It used to be on the basis that some drivers/depots only ran council contracted routes so there wasn't enough money in the pot to pay them more money that drivers on commercially viable routes got.
@Dan - sorry I've been out of it for nearly 2 years now - at least a little has changed then.
@Andreos1 - Leopard changing his spots - Nah don't think so
(15 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm)Adrian wrote I'm not so sure. After the GNW fiasco, it'd probably suit NF to have someone else willing to play bad cop. I'd suspect he's still the organ grinder.
It's not. The equal pay claims are based on women not only being paid less, but being employed on less favourable terms, e.g. being excluded from bonus and pension schemes.
Whilst having two tier workforces like low cost units is divisive, it's not outlawed. If it was only women employed to low cost units however, then there'd be an equal pay claim in that.
Sent from my SM-S916B using Tapatalk
Sometimes sarcasm comes across in written format.
Other times it doesn't.
This was one of those occasions.
It's pretty obvious who is pulling the strings here and BM (willingly or not), is clearly the one attached to the end of those strings.