(29 Sep 2023, 12:07 pm)Shrek wrote If a person has to choose to work instead of strike in order to feed their kids or keep on top of rent, I can fully understand that. I also think anyone who doesn't want to strike should be allowed to work if they want to without taking abuse.
A good friend of mine got abuse from some union reps when nurses were on strike and she had to cross the picket line to work in A&E to provide the cover that had to be there and was agreed by the unions. Personally I don't see why unions have to be as hostile as they are. You can make an equally good case while remaining civil.
Generally speaking, they aren't, but you're talking about a situation where tensions are extremely high. It's always going to be the case when money is involved. Most unions operate hardship funds, so those that are genuinely in need of hardship to strike, will be supported out of funds.
People of course, legally, have the right to still attend work if they so desire, but I sometimes think at the same time they expect a pat on the back for doing so. Whilst they have every right to work, those on strike have the right to try and persuade them or refuse to speak to them.
To talk about hostility, I think it's worth looking at the communications that the company have put out. They've been specifically written to try and make union members (their own employees) out to be public enemy number one. Furthermore, they've allowed abuse of their drivers to continue on their social media platforms, when in the past they've limited comments and such to avoid this.
Even taking the latest press release: "Ben Maxfield said, “I would like to offer my deepest apologies to people across the region who will be affected by Unite’s strike. Rest assured we will continue to work towards the quickest solution possible.”"
It's worth remembering that you never have a dispute without a bad employer.
(29 Sep 2023, 12:05 pm)Ambassador wrote https://www.gonortheast.co.uk/unite-call...ike-action
Have they intentionally put Ben's phone number on their website?
Bit of an odd move. They've done it with previous press releases too.
I'm not sure why they need to add notes to editors on their own website?