(05 Jan 2016, 8:35 pm)Davie wrote I forgot to mention, one of the Redarrow B9's blind wasn't working. It wasn't showing the service number, but did show the destination and via points.
(05 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm)Greg in Weardale wrote Exactly my point. Deckers don't need to be DDA. And I doubt that in the real world anyone is going to be worried about even a single decker going round with no destination for a day or two until it can be fixed. Anything is better than a bus being cancelled. Yes it's reasonable to expect wheelchair access, but many of the DDA regulations are obsessive pedantry and are unfair expense to small operators trying to run buses where everything favours the big guys.
(05 Jan 2016, 7:51 pm)Greg in Weardale wrote Yes 9119 is plastic and cheap, nowhere as good as an Enviro 400 MMC, but it is better than a knackered, ancient President and Streetdecks on X21 will be an improvement on the current hotch potch of vehicles. If 6037 is out on X21 with no destination tomorrow then someone give the driver a sheet of A4 paper ... A3 even better ... and a black felt tip and tell him to write NEWCASTLE on one side and BISHOP AUCKLAND on the other and put it in the windscreen. Not ideal, but it's better than nothing and perfectly legal, even if the DDA secret police are about.
(05 Jan 2016, 8:39 pm)Adrian wrote I'd disagree, and suggest its looked at in another way. If there's no standard set in writing, then it potentially allows every vehicle to be fitted to a different standard. Being in a wheelchair isn't a prerequisite to being classed as disabled, and it's important to recognise the huge spectrum of disabilities out there.
(06 Jan 2016, 12:13 am)rc81 wrote The front destination number on one of the cobalt connects was not working tonight. Was going through earsdon at around 5:30, didn't catch fleet number as going in opposite direction
(06 Jan 2016, 11:40 am)S813 FVK wrote Can we start doing the destination reports via PM to the relevant people now? Getting tiring seeing this thread clogged up with 'xxxx's destination wasnt working'Agreed.
(05 Jan 2016, 8:23 pm)S813 FVK wrote 5389, 5390 and 8328 are all corporate livered spares for services Q1/Q2/Q3 (and service 58?)And other services I've seen it sneek onto other services
(05 Jan 2016, 8:42 pm)pdiddy wrote The destination was working perfectly fine when it left the depot this morning.... otherwise it would of had a temp destination put in the windscreen till the bus got to chester to be repaired/replacedDestination now working I've photographed the bus on the freezing cold
(06 Jan 2016, 4:56 am)Dan wrote I should be able to track which bus it was given that the 19 is a fairly infrequent service - which direction was it heading in, when passing through Earsdon at 17:30?
The OmniCitys are renowned for the panel of LEDs for the route number going off. Always a temperamental fault, as they seem to work in the depot but go off when they leave!
(07 Jan 2016, 11:47 am)Acky81 wrote Eventually salt meadows has been clogged up for months. Saw an old x40 artic being towed away yesterday too and an old toon link the previous day
(08 Jan 2016, 10:22 am)BusLoverMum wrote Waiting for branding for the loop, I wonder? It's had a lot of subs on it, recently.
(08 Jan 2016, 10:32 am)Dan wrote Yes, 5219 returned to service following repaint yesterday (which is why 5220 has gone to Saltmeadows Rd in its place).
Probably going to be at least one red single-deck on the Loop services every day for the next few months, excluding weekends.
(08 Jan 2016, 3:38 pm)Dan wrote As the first MPD for Hexham has now returned to service following repaint... The colourscheme is slightly more interesting than just yellow as originally noted: there's also a bit of blue on there, too!
(08 Jan 2016, 4:37 pm)G-CPTN wrote The yellow-with-blue MPD was my 687 ride from Corbridge to ALDI this morning (10:55 - 11:07)
AFAICR it was a blue roof.
Why blue?
