(09 Aug 2016, 7:14 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote Although already asked what will replace 3866,67 even though there is 4 month i dont know weather the following could happen
4x new buses for 327 this will allow 3866,67 to be withdrawn and 3890,1 to replace plaxton presidents.
2x omnidekkas allowing 3876,7 to be withdrawn
Im not sure if GNE have a plan for them but i think its a shame they dont meet dda.
Could GNE make them DDA complaint alike the B10S?

I think it's something fundamental and integral thus uneconomical to repair given the state of the Loynes/life cycle. The Renowns are going strong and IIRC it was just some issue with the seats, but most of the Loynes have already died or are withdrawn/unhealthy.

(09 Aug 2016, 7:14 pm)biglugs@yahoo.com wrote Although already asked what will replace 3866,67 even though there is 4 month i dont know weather the following could happen
4x new buses for 327 this will allow 3866,67 to be withdrawn and 3890,1 to replace plaxton presidents.
2x omnidekkas allowing 3876,7 to be withdrawn
Im not sure if GNE have a plan for them but i think its a shame they dont meet dda.
Could GNE make them DDA complaint alike the B10S?

I think it's more likely that stock from Brighton & Hove will release Dennis Tridents from Stanley to Percy Main similar to the existing allocation.

(09 Aug 2016, 7:15 pm)Tom wrote Has a Vyking replaced 6034 at Percy Main? One was on the 1 yesterday according to dannygne.

No.

6034 was only a float/reserve vehicle at Percy Main (covering for 6104 which was having the GKN flywheel removed).

It stayed for a few weeks longer, but has now been released to Chester-le-Street (temporarily forming part of the allocation here), allowing 3983 to transfer to Riverside, which will allow a further Volvo B10BLE to be withdrawn later this month after the Blyth Tall Ships event.

3974 was the Vyking on service 1 yesterday and I believe it covered one journey due to a breakdown/incident.

Is there any report on the findings of the GKN flywheel trials?

Is the Metrocity still here?, if so any chance it will move to a different depot before it goes back>?

(10 Aug 2016, 11:43 am)Michael wrote Is the Metrocity still here?, if so any chance it will move to a different depot before it goes back>?

No, think it's now at First Halifax.

(10 Aug 2016, 11:43 am)Michael wrote Is the Metrocity still here?, if so any chance it will move to a different depot before it goes back>?

What about 9101?

(10 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm)NK53 TKT wrote What about 9101?

http://northeastbuses.co.uk/forum/showth...p?tid=1825&pid=175734#pid175734

Obviously a bit out of date for 9102.

(10 Aug 2016, 6:38 am)G-CPTN wrote Is there any report on the findings of the GKN flywheel trials?

Will be interesting. Considering the time, momey and manpower required to fit the flywheels, they might as well wait until the need for cascades is due with the GKN earmarked services being replaced with Streetdecks. Given the recent service changes as well as other services due for an upgrade, I think it will happen within the next 12-18 months.

(10 Aug 2016, 3:19 pm)L469 YVK wrote Will be interesting. Considering the time, momey and manpower required to fit the flywheels, they might as well wait until the need for cascades is due with the GKN earmarked services being replaced with Streetdecks. Given the recent service changes as well as other services due for an upgrade, I think it will happen within the next 12-18 months.

Given that the two vehicles fitted with the GKN Flywheels have now had them removed, I think that suggests what the success of the flywheel was like (up here, at least!)

I cannot imagine a report being published, though.

(10 Aug 2016, 3:35 pm)Dan wrote Given that the two vehicles fitted with the GKN Flywheels have now had them removed, I think that suggests what the success of the flywheel was like (up here, at least!)

I cannot imagine a report being published, though.

Thanks.

(10 Aug 2016, 3:35 pm)Dan wrote Given that the two vehicles fitted with the GKN Flywheels have now had them removed, I think that suggests what the success of the flywheel was like (up here, at least!)

I cannot imagine a report being published, though.

This isn't an order prediction as such Dan but if the need arose for cascades and there was a good business case to do so (extra fuel savings, right traffic conditions etc), do you think GNE would end up replacing the B9s on the Cobalts or Fab 56 with Streetdecks in the near future? Not that I'd want them to go BTW but I'd imagine the fuel saving potential would be good on these types of routes.

(10 Aug 2016, 4:18 pm)L469 YVK wrote This isn't an order prediction as such Dan but if the need arose for cascades and there was a good business case to do so (extra fuel savings, right traffic conditions etc), do you think GNE would end up replacing the B9s on the Cobalts or Fab 56 with Streetdecks in the near future? Not that I'd want them to go BTW but I'd imagine the fuel saving potential would be good on these types of routes.

I can't see that happening any time soon, really.

There are other double-decker routes which would benefit from an upgrade first. By no means a suggestion that it'll happen, but the TEN is currently running at a PVR of 16 with just 13 branded vehicles. The current situation isn't ideal, but it's about designing changes which are right for both the business and customers. Investing into this route would mean that 16 branded vehicles could be ordered with two spares. The TEN is a high-profile route, which has proven to be worthy of upgrades time after time.

(10 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm)Dan wrote I can't see that happening any time soon, really.

There are other double-decker routes which would benefit from an upgrade first. By no means a suggestion that it'll happen, but the TEN is currently running at a PVR of 16 with just 13 branded vehicles. The current situation isn't ideal, but it's about designing changes which are right for both the business and customers. Investing into this route would mean that 16 branded vehicles could be ordered with two spares. The TEN is a high-profile route, which has proven to be worthy of upgrades time after time.

Is that a hint Dan?

(10 Aug 2016, 7:05 pm)Michael wrote Is that a hint Dan?

Nope - I did clearly say it's not a suggestion that it'll happen!

(10 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm)Dan wrote I can't see that happening any time soon, really.

There are other double-decker routes which would benefit from an upgrade first. By no means a suggestion that it'll happen, but the TEN is currently running at a PVR of 16 with just 13 branded vehicles. The current situation isn't ideal, but it's about designing changes which are right for both the business and customers. Investing into this route would mean that 16 branded vehicles could be ordered with two spares. The TEN is a high-profile route, which has proven to be worthy of upgrades time after time.

Any chance of some divine intervention for my Angel Dan?

(10 Aug 2016, 7:14 pm)Ambassador wrote Any chance of some divine intervention for my Angel Dan?

A nice batch of Omnicities would go down nicely for the 21

(10 Aug 2016, 7:14 pm)Ambassador wrote Any chance of some divine intervention for my Angel Dan?

Another high-profile route which would benefit from having a full allocation of vehicles to the same specification with an appropriate number of spares - one of which could be shared with service X21!

(10 Aug 2016, 7:19 pm)citaro5284 wrote A nice batch of Omnicities would go down nicely for the 21

Vehicle swap with Coaster? 

(10 Aug 2016, 7:21 pm)Dan wrote Another high-profile route which would benefit from having a full allocation of vehicles to the same specification with an appropriate number of spares - one of which could be shared with service X21

 
You tease! Hybrids due off next year?

Imagine they'd need a fairly lightened end of life route

(10 Aug 2016, 7:23 pm)Ambassador wrote You tease! Hybrids due off next year?

Imagine they'd need a fairly lightened end of life route

No teasing intended - just of the opinion that high-profile routes should consistently offer the advertised features such as Wi-Fi and power sockets!

As was said by someone else on the forum recently, it would be difficult to get a business case to stack up to retrofit red ex-London B7s with Wi-Fi when these vehicles are close to the end of their working lives, but if/when the services are invested in, I would expect sufficient vehicles to be branded with an appropriate number of same spec spares.

(10 Aug 2016, 7:34 pm)Dan wrote No teasing intended - just of the opinion that high-profile routes should consistently offer the advertised features such as Wi-Fi and power sockets!

As was said by someone else on the forum recently, it would be difficult to get a business case to stack up to retrofit red ex-London B7s with Wi-Fi when these vehicles are close to the end of their working lives, but if/when the services are invested in, I would expect sufficient vehicles to be branded with an appropriate number of same spec spares.

Well lets hope GNE don't decide to change the services after then.

Exactly what's happened to some services - investment and then changed.

Red Kite - PVR increase months after they enterdd service, lost a spare, 45/46 - passengers on the 45/46 not guarated sockets now.


Indigo North Tyne - services changed so that means 4 older solo's are needed months after an investment.

(10 Aug 2016, 7:34 pm)Dan wrote No teasing intended - just of the opinion that high-profile routes should consistently offer the advertised features such as Wi-Fi and power sockets!

As was said by someone else on the forum recently, it would be difficult to get a business case to stack up to retrofit red ex-London B7s with Wi-Fi when these vehicles are close to the end of their working lives, but if/when the services are invested in, I would expect sufficient vehicles to be branded with an appropriate number of same spec spares.

Indeed they should. Sometimes I feel the Angel is taken for granted as there's no competition (10 has the train and Arriva) Coast Rd has competition whereas the Angel has a monopoly

(10 Aug 2016, 7:34 pm)Dan wrote No teasing intended - just of the opinion that high-profile routes should consistently offer the advertised features such as Wi-Fi and power sockets!

As was said by someone else on the forum recently, it would be difficult to get a business case to stack up to retrofit red ex-London B7s with Wi-Fi when these vehicles are close to the end of their working lives, but if/when the services are invested in, I would expect sufficient vehicles to be branded with an appropriate number of same spec spares.

Id say the Angel will be one of the next in line for investment, As they would be atleast 2 or 3 spares of the same vehicle type to stop Presidents and other vehicles from being allocated, And if Streetdeck's were bought then the spares could also be allocated to the X21 without missing any of the features found on that route ( Apart from Tables )

As much as id like to see a Euro 6 B5LH bought, I'd heavily doubt it will happen.

In terms of investment though, if a cascade of B9TLs was planned, which service out of the TEN and Cobalt Clipper would provide the biggest fuel savings if Streetdecks were to be ordered?

TEN:
- OK between Crawcrook and Newcastle
- Bit tough between Rockwood Hill and Blackhall Mill as well as between Hexham and Prudhoe
- Buses can get stuck in severe traffic around the Metrocentre occasionally

Cobalt Clipper:
- 310 a walk in the park bar very brief fast stint between Station Road & Benfield Road (mainly utilised for timekeeping where speed is concerned)
- 309 similar, also operates some fast stints along Blyth Road and Links Road (60MPH NSL single carriageways)as well as New York Road between Arnold Clark and New York Roundabout (if not invaded by the '40 in a 60' brigade grrrr!)
- 2x X39 runs (if 07:25 is an odd working as I believe, correct me if I'm wrong) in both directions Mondays to Fridays, not too demanding but fast
- Buses can get stuck in severe traffic around Cobalt Business Park and outlying areas occasionally

(10 Aug 2016, 8:16 pm)L469 YVK wrote TEN:
- Buses can get stuck in severe traffic around the Metrocentre occasionally

Cobalt Clipper:
- Buses can get stuck in severe traffic around Cobalt Business Park and outlying areas occasionally

With regards to slow moving/stop start traffic, are auto engine stop/start vehicles available on the market for GNE?

(10 Aug 2016, 8:28 pm)northern156 wrote With regards to slow moving/stop start traffic, are auto engine stop/start vehicles available on the market for GNE?

I believe the only Manufacturer currently offering a Start/Stop option is Alexander Dennis.

(10 Aug 2016, 8:32 pm)Kuyoyo wrote I believe the only Manufacturer currently offering a Start/Stop option is Alexander Dennis.

Interesting... would like to see how they fare in terms of additional MPG

I am naturally very protective of the TEN, and believe that the B9TLs are ideal for the westerly section of the route - there are gradients (such as Tinklers Bank at Corbridge) which the B9s cope with admirably - I'm not sure that a 5 litre engine would be adequate.

It is mildly 'disappointing' when non-liveried vehicles (by which I mean red B7TLs) have to be used (the TEN livery is so good IMO), though any bus is preferable to no bus. What is strange is that 3942 used to be in TEN livery before it was repainted red.

Hexham do a superb job of using whatever spares they have to keep the service(s) 'on schedule' - I spotted a TEN B9TL running the X84 heading east through Corbridge on Tuesday @ 17.30ish (a few minutes late - but running nevertheless) and I've seen B9TLs on the occasional X84/X85 during 'daytime'.

In return we get the occasional single decker running the TEN (it comes as a surprise when they turn into central Corbridge instead of continuing along Main Street and Newcastle Road).

What I'm trying to say is don't mess with the current allocation (except where necessary to fill gaps) as the current vehicles seem to be ideally suited to the routes.

I dread to think what will happen when the B9TLs wear out - though maybe that will be a long time yet?

(11 Aug 2016, 12:10 am)G-CPTN wrote I am naturally very protective of the TEN, and believe that the B9TLs are ideal for the westerly section of the route - there are gradients (such as Tinklers Bank at Corbridge) which the B9s cope with admirably - I'm not sure that a 5 litre engine would be adequate.

It is mildly 'disappointing' when non-liveried vehicles (by which I mean red B7TLs) have to be used (the TEN livery is so good IMO), though any bus is preferable to no bus. What is strange is that 3942 used to be in TEN livery before it was repainted red.

Hexham do a superb job of using whatever spares they have to keep the service(s) 'on schedule' - I spotted a TEN B9TL running the X84 heading east through Corbridge on Tuesday @ 17.30ish (a few minutes late - but running nevertheless) and I've seen B9TLs on the occasional X84/X85 during 'daytime'.

In return we get the occasional single decker running the TEN (it comes as a surprise when they turn into central Corbridge instead of continuing along Main Street and Newcastle Road).

What I'm trying to say is don't mess with the current allocation (except where necessary to fill gaps) as the current vehicles seem to be ideally suited to the routes.

I dread to think what will happen when the B9TLs wear out - though maybe that will be a long time yet?

Hopefully, i think they really suit the TEN, continuing about "red" buses etc on them due to lack of B9's, i think GNE will want to upgrade the TTX soon, as i doubt they'll want a repeat of what happened with the B7's, with the constant breakdowns, of course, that's if GNE decide to replace them in the next financial year (2017-2018), or even this years!, then the TTX B9's could go on the TEN and Cobalt Clippers along with a couple of spares.

(11 Aug 2016, 9:47 am)Michael wrote Hopefully, i think they really suit the TEN, continuing about "red" buses etc on them due to lack of B9's, i think GNE will want to upgrade the TTX soon, as i doubt they'll want a repeat of what happened with the B7's, with the constant breakdowns, of course, that's if GNE decide to replace them in the next financial year (2017-2018), or even this years!, then the TTX B9's could go on the TEN and Cobalt Clippers along with a couple of spares.

Have noticed more reportings on GNE's Facebook of X9/X10's not operating from Middlesbrough due to breakdowns, think there's been two this week already, plus there has been allocations of Green Arrow Solar's and 6047 being kept local. Think something like Neoplan Skyliner's but maybe more modern would be the way to go for the X9/X10 as they would probably last longer than four years before they start breaking down on a fairly regular basis, sadly I can't see this happening due to the cost implications.

5385 is now branded for Q3.