(22 Sep 2018, 2:49 pm)Malarkey Terminate them at Claypath
(22 Sep 2018, 2:49 pm)Malarkey Terminate them at Claypath
(22 Sep 2018, 2:49 pm)Malarkey Terminate them at Claypath
I wonder what the frequency of the Sunderland to shields section would of been on the 20/20A due to the hold ups at gilesgate, should of sent the 60 to shields and have the 20/20A only between Sunderland and Durham only as Durham is unpredictable
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(23 Sep 2018, 6:43 am)cbma06 I wonder what the frequency of the Sunderland to shields section would of been on the 20/20A due to the hold ups at gilesgate, should of sent the 60 to shields and have the 20/20A only between Sunderland and Durham only as Durham is unpredictable
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(23 Sep 2018, 6:43 am)cbma06 I wonder what the frequency of the Sunderland to shields section would of been on the 20/20A due to the hold ups at gilesgate, should of sent the 60 to shields and have the 20/20A only between Sunderland and Durham only as Durham is unpredictable
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(23 Sep 2018, 7:27 am)deanmachine The 60?! The 60 is worse than the 20 for reliability due to Seaham being unpredictable for most of the day.
There’s nothing wrong with the reliability of the 20 outside peak times. Yesterday was only bad due to the perfect storm the 15 times a year Sunderland play at home on and a busy Saturday in Durham.
(23 Sep 2018, 7:27 am)deanmachine The 60?! The 60 is worse than the 20 for reliability due to Seaham being unpredictable for most of the day.
There’s nothing wrong with the reliability of the 20 outside peak times. Yesterday was only bad due to the perfect storm the 15 times a year Sunderland play at home on and a busy Saturday in Durham.
(23 Sep 2018, 8:30 am)S830OFT The 20 should go back to Sunderland to Durham only with a new route between Sunderland and South Shields.Why? What would that achieve?
(23 Sep 2018, 8:30 am)S830OFT The 20 should go back to Sunderland to Durham only with a new route between Sunderland and South Shields.Why? What would that achieve?
(23 Sep 2018, 8:34 am)Dan Why? What would that achieve?
Reliability isn't an issue, other than on match days when Sunderland play at home. In this instance all that needs to be done is for the service to be regulated effectively on a match day to combat late-running.
By no means should a re-hash of the services in Sunderland be necessary.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
(23 Sep 2018, 8:34 am)Dan Why? What would that achieve?
Reliability isn't an issue, other than on match days when Sunderland play at home. In this instance all that needs to be done is for the service to be regulated effectively on a match day to combat late-running.
By no means should a re-hash of the services in Sunderland be necessary.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
(23 Sep 2018, 8:38 am)Jamie M Put it on the end of 8/78/78A..! It's such an obvious missing link between Pelton and Cleadon!
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
(23 Sep 2018, 8:38 am)Jamie M Put it on the end of 8/78/78A..! It's such an obvious missing link between Pelton and Cleadon!
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk